A framework for modeling epistatic interaction
Abstract
Motivation: Recently, various tools for detecting single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) involved in epistasis have been developed. However, no studies evaluate the employed statistical epistasis models such as the χ2-test or quadratic regression independently of the tools that use them. Such an independent evaluation is crucial for developing improved epistasis detection tools, for it allows to decide if a tool’s performance should be attributed to the epistasis model or to the optimization strategy run on top of it. Results: We present a protocol for evaluating epistasis models independently of the tools they are used in and generalize existing models designed for dichotomous phenotypes to the categorical and quantitative case. In addition, we propose a new model which scores candidate SNP sets by computing maximum likelihood distributions for the observed phenotypes in the cells of their penetrance tables. Extensive experiments show that the proposed maximum likelihood model outperforms three widely used epistasis models in most cases. The experiments also provide valuable insights into the properties of existing models, for instance, that quadratic regression perform particularly well on instances with quantitative phenotypes. Availability and implementation: The evaluation protocol and all compared models are implemented in C++ and are supported under Linux and macOS. They are available at https://github.com/baumbachlab/genepiseeker/, along with test datasets and scripts to reproduce the experiments. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ε4-stratified analyses obviate concerns about appropriate modeling of the interaction term (eg, linear vs multiplicative).
“In addition, ε4-stratified analyses obviate concerns about appropriate modeling of the interaction term (eg, linear vs multiplicative).27”
From Association of African Ancestry–Specific <i>APOE</i> Missense Variant R145C With Risk of Alzheimer Disease (2023) · cites this paper as [27]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Le Guen, Y., Raulin, A.-C., Logue, M. W., Sherva, R., Belloy, M. E., Eger, S. J., Chen, A., Kennedy, G., Kuchenbecker, L., O’Leary, J. P., et al. (2023) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2023.0268 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
- Authors
- Blumenthal, D. B., Baumbach, J., Hoffmann, M., Kacprowski, T., & List, M.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Blumenthal, David B
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-11-30
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1708-1716
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W3109840083
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Research Council
- European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (777111)
- German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01ZX1908A)
- German Science Foundation
- Collaborative Research Center (SFB1371)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Keywords
- epistasis, single nucleotide polymorphisms, epistasis detection, maximum likelihood model, quantitative phenotypes, quadratic regression, chi-square test, model evaluation
- MeSH terms
- Epistasis, Genetic, Phenotype, Probability, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review