Cited by 16Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

Deep Local Analysis evaluates protein docking conformations with locally oriented cubes

Open access
Mohseni Behbahani, Yasser, Crouzet, Simon, Laine, Elodie, Carbone, Alessandra·2022·Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: With the recent advances in protein 3D structure prediction, protein interactions are becoming more central than ever before. Here, we address the problem of determining how proteins interact with one another. More specifically, we investigate the possibility of discriminating near-native protein complex conformations from incorrect ones by exploiting local environments around interfacial residues. Results: Deep Local Analysis (DLA)-Ranker is a deep learning framework applying 3D convolutions to a set of locally oriented cubes representing the protein interface. It explicitly considers the local geometry of the interfacial residues along with their neighboring atoms and the regions of the interface with different solvent accessibility. We assessed its performance on three docking benchmarks made of half a million acceptable and incorrect conformations. We show that DLA-Ranker successfully identifies near-native conformations from ensembles generated by molecular docking. It surpasses or competes with other deep learning-based scoring functions. We also showcase its usefulness to discover alternative interfaces. Availability and implementation: http://gitlab.lcqb.upmc.fr/dla-ranker/DLA-Ranker.git Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac551

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Mohseni Behbahani, Y., Crouzet, S., Laine, E., & Carbone, A.
Affiliations
  • Sorbonne Université, CNRS, IBPS, Laboratory of Computational and Quantitative Biology (LCQB), UMR 7238 , Paris 75005, France
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Carbone, Alessandra
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2022-08-13
Volume
38
Issue
19
Pages
4505-4512
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W4291237382
Cited by
16
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
From the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-21-CE17-0046)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein docking, protein-protein interaction, protein complex conformation, interfacial residues, 3D convolution, solvent accessibility
MeSH terms
Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review