Cited by 54Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

End-to-end learning of multiple sequence alignments with differentiable Smith–Waterman

Open access
Petti, Samantha, Bhattacharya, Nicholas, Rao, Roshan, Dauparas, Justas, Thomas, Neil, Zhou, Juannan, Rush, Alexander M, Koo, Peter +1 more·2023·Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: Multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) of homologous sequences contain information on structural and functional constraints and their evolutionary histories. Despite their importance for many downstream tasks, such as structure prediction, MSA generation is often treated as a separate pre-processing step, without any guidance from the application it will be used for. Results: Here, we implement a smooth and differentiable version of the Smith–Waterman pairwise alignment algorithm that enables jointly learning an MSA and a downstream machine learning system in an end-to-end fashion. To demonstrate its utility, we introduce SMURF (Smooth Markov Unaligned Random Field), a new method that jointly learns an alignment and the parameters of a Markov Random Field for unsupervised contact prediction. We find that SMURF learns MSAs that mildly improve contact prediction on a diverse set of protein and RNA families. As a proof of concept, we demonstrate that by connecting our differentiable alignment module to AlphaFold2 and maximizing predicted confidence, we can learn MSAs that improve structure predictions over the initial MSAs. Interestingly, the alignments that improve AlphaFold predictions are self-inconsistent and can be viewed as adversarial. This work highlights the potential of differentiable dynamic programming to improve neural network pipelines that rely on an alignment and the potential dangers of optimizing predictions of protein sequences with methods that are not fully understood. Availability and implementation: Our code and examples are available at: https://github.com/spetti/SMURF. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac724

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petti, S., Bhattacharya, N., Rao, R., Dauparas, J., Thomas, N., Zhou, J., Rush, A. M., Koo, P., & Ovchinnikov, S.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Cornell Tech (US)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Ovchinnikov, Sergey
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2022-11-10
Volume
39
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W4308687190
Cited by
54
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (S10OD028632-01)
  • FAS Division of Science, Research Computing Group at Harvard University
  • NSF-Simons Center for Mathematical and Statistical Analysis of Biology at Harvard (#1764269)
  • NIH (R35-GM134922, DP5OD026389)
  • Exascale Computing Project (17-SC-20-SC)
  • Department of Energy Office of Science
  • National Nuclear Security Administration
  • Simons Center for Quantitative Biology at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
  • Developmental Funds from the Cancer Center Support (5P30CA045508)
  • NSF (MCB2032259)
  • Moore–Simons Project on the Origin of the Eukaryotic Cell, Simons Foundation (735929LPI)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
multiple sequence alignment, end-to-end learning, SMURF, Markov random fields, protein structure prediction, RNA structure prediction, AlphaFold2, adversarial alignment
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Humans, Proteins, Sequence Alignment, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review