Cited by 83Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Perceiver CPI: a nested cross-attention network for compound–protein interaction prediction

Open access
Nguyen, Ngoc-Quang, Jang, Gwanghoon, Kim, Hajung, Kang, Jaewoo·2023·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: Compound–protein interaction (CPI) plays an essential role in drug discovery and is performed via expensive molecular docking simulations. Many artificial intelligence-based approaches have been proposed in this regard. Recently, two types of models have accomplished promising results in exploiting molecular information: graph convolutional neural networks that construct a learned molecular representation from a graph structure (atoms and bonds), and neural networks that can be applied to compute on descriptors or fingerprints of molecules. However, the superiority of one method over the other is yet to be determined. Modern studies have endeavored to aggregate information that is extracted from compounds and proteins to form the CPI task. Nonetheless, these approaches have used a simple concatenation to combine them, which cannot fully capture the interaction between such information. Results: We propose the Perceiver CPI network, which adopts a cross-attention mechanism to improve the learning ability of the representation of drug and target interactions and exploits the rich information obtained from extended-connectivity fingerprints to improve the performance. We evaluated Perceiver CPI on three main datasets, Davis, KIBA and Metz, to compare the performance of our proposed model with that of state-of-the-art methods. The proposed method achieved satisfactory performance and exhibited significant improvements over previous approaches in all experiments. Availability and implementation: Perceiver CPI is available at https://github.com/dmis-lab/PerceiverCPI. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac731

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Nguyen, N.-Q., Jang, G., Kim, H., & Kang, J.
Affiliations
Korea University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kang, Jaewoo
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2022-11-23
Volume
39
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W4309728351
Cited by
83
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 10
FWCI
8.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2020R1A2C3010638, NRF-2014M3C9A3063541)
  • Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HR20C0021)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
compound-protein interaction prediction, cross-attention, Perceiver, ECFP, molecular representation, drug-target interactions, graph convolutional networks, molecular descriptors, drug discovery
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Proteins, Neural Networks, Computer, Protein Interaction Maps, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review