Cited by 2,440Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

YaHS: yet another Hi-C scaffolding tool

Open access
Zhou, Chenxi, McCarthy, Shane A, Durbin, Richard·2023·Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Summary: We present YaHS, a user-friendly command-line tool for the construction of chromosome-scale scaffolds from Hi-C data. It can be run with a single-line command, requires minimal input from users (an assembly file and an alignment file) which is compatible with similar tools and provides assembly results in multiple formats, thereby enabling rapid, robust and scalable construction of high-quality genome assemblies with high accuracy and contiguity. Availability and implementation: YaHS is implemented in C and licensed under the MIT License. The source code, documentation and tutorial are available at https://github.com/sanger-tol/yahs. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac808

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genome sequencing and assembly have become increasingly affordable and computationally tractable thanks to long-read sequencing technologies, DNA proximity ligation sequencing techniques, and genome sequencing consortia.

    “Genome sequencing and assembly have become increasingly affordable and computationally tractable thanks to the development of long-read sequencing technologies like the Pacific Biosciences and Oxford Nanopore platforms (52); the development of DNA proximity ligation sequencing techniques, like Hi-C, for genome scaffolding (53–55); and the efforts of genome sequencing consortia (1, 2, 4, 56)”

    From Topological Approaches in Animal Comparative Genomics (2026) · cites this paper as [53]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Blaxter M. et al; The Darwin Tree of Life Project Consortium. (2022) Sequence locally, think globally: the Darwin Tree of Life Project. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 119, e2115642118. PMC8797607 35042805
  2. Burton J.N. et al (2013) Chromosome-scale scaffolding of de novo genome assemblies based on chromatin interactions. Nat. Biotechnol., 31, 1119– 1125. 24185095 PMC4117202
  3. Dudchenko O. et al (2017) De novo assembly of the Aedes aegypti genome using Hi-C yields chromosome-length scaffolds. Science, 356, 92– 95. 28336562 PMC5635820
  4. Durand N.C. et al (2016) Juicebox provides a visualization system for Hi-C contact maps with unlimited zoom. Cell Syst., 3, 99– 101. 27467250 PMC5596920
  5. Ghurye J. et al (2019) Integrating Hi-C links with assembly graphs for chromosome-scale assembly. PLoS Comput. Biol., 15, e1007273. 31433799 PMC6719893
  6. Guan D. et al (2021) Efficient iterative Hi-C scaffolder based on N-best neighbors. BMC Bioinformatics, 22, 1– 16. 34837944 PMC8627104
  7. Kadota M. et al (2020) Multifaceted Hi-C benchmarking: what makes a difference in chromosome-scale genome scaffolding? Gigascience, 9, giz158. PMC6952475 31919520
  8. Lewin H.A. et al (2018) Earth Biogenome Project: sequencing life for the future of life. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 4325– 4333. 29686065 PMC5924910
  9. Lieberman-Aiden E. et al (2009) Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science, 326, 289– 293. 19815776 PMC2858594
  10. Mikheenko A. et al (2018) Versatile genome assembly evaluation with QUAST-LG. Bioinformatics, 34, i142– i150. 29949969 PMC6022658
  11. Nurk S. et al (2022) The complete sequence of a human genome. Science, 376, 44– 53. 35357919 PMC9186530
  12. Putnam N.H. et al (2016) Chromosome-scale shotgun assembly using an in vitro method for long-range linkage. Genome Res., 26, 342– 350. 26848124 PMC4772016
  13. Rhie A. et al (2021) Towards complete and error-free genome assemblies of all vertebrate species. Nature, 592, 737– 746. 33911273 PMC8081667
  14. Zhang X. et al (2019) Assembly of allele-aware, chromosomal-scale autopolyploid genomes based on Hi-C data. Nat. Plants, 5, 833– 845. 31383970

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, C., McCarthy, S. A., & Durbin, R.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Durbin, Richard
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2022-12-16
Volume
39
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W4311663808
Cited by
2,440
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 743 · 2025: 751 · 2024: 626 · 2023: 302 · 2022: 18
FWCI
138.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
Wellcome (207492, 218328, 220540)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
Hi-C scaffolding, genome assembly, long-read alignment, contiguity
MeSH terms
Documentation, Software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review