Identifying B-cell epitopes using AlphaFold2 predicted structures and pretrained language model
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Motivation: Identifying the B-cell epitopes is an essential step for guiding rational vaccine development and immunotherapies. Since experimental approaches are expensive and time-consuming, many computational methods have been designed to assist B-cell epitope prediction. However, existing sequence-based methods have limited performance since they only use contextual features of the sequential neighbors while neglecting structural information. Results: Based on the recent breakthrough of AlphaFold2 in protein structure prediction, we propose GraphBepi, a novel graph-based model for accurate B-cell epitope prediction. For one protein, the predicted structure from AlphaFold2 is used to construct the protein graph, where the nodes/residues are encoded by ESM-2 learning representations. The graph is input into the edge-enhanced deep graph neural network (EGNN) to capture the spatial information in the predicted 3D structures. In parallel, a bidirectional long short-term memory neural networks (BiLSTM) are employed to capture long-range dependencies in the sequence. The learned low-dimensional representations by EGNN and BiLSTM are then combined into a multilayer perceptron for predicting B-cell epitopes. Through comprehensive tests on the curated epitope dataset, GraphBepi was shown to outperform the state-of-the-art methods by more than 5.5% and 44.0% in terms of AUC and AUPR, respectively. A web server is freely available at http://bio-web1.nscc-gz.cn/app/graphbepi. Availability and implementation: The datasets, pre-computed features, source codes, and the trained model are available at https://github.com/biomed-AI/GraphBepi.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
UniRef: comprehensive and non-redundant UniProt reference clusters
Suzek, B. E., Huang, H., McGarvey, P., Mazumder, R., & Wu, C. H. (2007) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm098 · Cited by 1,613 · see citing works
Reliable B cell epitope predictions: impacts of method development and improved benchmarking
Kringelum, J. V., Lundegaard, C., Lund, O., & Nielsen, M. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002829 · Cited by 697 · see citing works
Protein-level assembly increases protein sequence recovery from metagenomic samples manyfold
Steinegger, M., Mirdita, M., & Söding, J. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0437-4 · Cited by 445 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We have also tested another similar protein language model ProtT5-XL-U50 (Elnaggar et al. 2020) (denoted as ProtTrans), which is first trained on BFD (Steinegger et al. 2019) and then fine-tuned on the UniRef50.”
MethodTubiana, J., Schneidman-Duhovny, D., & Wolfson, H. J. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01490-7 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Linear antibody epitope prediction using AlphaFold2
DeRoo, J., Terry, J. S., Zhao, N., Stasevich, T. J., Snow, C., & Geiss, B. J. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.98369 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zeng, Y., Wei, Z., Yuan, Q., Chen, S., Yu, W., Lu, Y., Gao, J., & Yang, Y.
- Affiliations
- Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
- Nankai University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Gao, Jianzhao
- Yang, Yuedong
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2023-04-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- PMC
- PMC10126322
- OpenAlex
- W4364353366
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 6.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFF1203100)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Guangzhou S& Research Plan (202007030010)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- B-cell epitope prediction, AlphaFold2, protein structure, graph neural networks, ESM-2, BiLSTM, protein graphs, deep learning, vaccine design
- MeSH terms
- Language, Proteins, Software, Neural Networks, Computer, Epitopes, B-Lymphocyte
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review