Cited by 6Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

Utilizing the scale-invariant feature transform algorithm to align distance matrices facilitates systematic protein structure comparison

Open access
Guo, Zhengyang, Wang, Yang, Ou, Guangshuo·2024·Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: Protein structure comparison is pivotal for deriving homological relationships, elucidating protein functions, and understanding evolutionary developments. The burgeoning field of in-silico protein structure prediction now yields billions of models with near-experimental accuracy, necessitating sophisticated tools for discerning structural similarities among proteins, particularly when sequence similarity is limited. Results: In this article, we have developed the align distance matrix with scale (ADAMS) pipeline, which synergizes the distance matrix alignment method with the scale-invariant feature transform algorithm, streamlining protein structure comparison on a proteomic scale. Utilizing a computer vision-centric strategy for contrasting disparate distance matrices, ADAMS adeptly alleviates challenges associated with proteins characterized by a high degree of structural flexibility. Our findings indicate that ADAMS achieves a level of performance and accuracy on par with Foldseek, while maintaining similar speed. Crucially, ADAMS overcomes certain limitations of Foldseek in handling structurally flexible proteins, establishing it as an efficacious tool for in-depth protein structure analysis with heightened accuracy. Availability: ADAMS can be download and used as a python package from Python Package Index (PyPI): adams · PyPI. Source code and other materials are available from young55775/ADAMS-developing (github.com). An online server is available: Bseek Search Server (cryonet.ai)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae064

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Guo, Z., Wang, Y., & Ou, G.
Affiliations
Center for Life Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Ou, Guangshuo
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2024-02-06
Volume
40
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W4391575987
Cited by
6
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31991190, 31730052, 31861143042, 31671444, 31871352)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFA0508401, 2017YFA0102900)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein structure comparison, scale-invariant feature transform, structural similarity, structural flexibility, homology detection
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Computers, Proteins, Software, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review