Cited by 25Antibiotic Resistance in BacteriaMachine Learning in BioinformaticsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Prediction of antibiotic resistance mechanisms using a protein language model

Open access
Yagimoto, Kanami, Hosoda, Shion, Sato, Miwa, Hamada, Michiaki·2024·Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: Antibiotic resistance has emerged as a major global health threat, with an increasing number of bacterial infections becoming difficult to treat. Predicting the underlying resistance mechanisms of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) is crucial for understanding and combating this problem. However, existing methods struggle to accurately predict resistance mechanisms for ARGs with low similarity to known sequences and lack sufficient interpretability of the prediction models. Results: In this study, we present a novel approach for predicting ARG resistance mechanisms using ProteinBERT, a protein language model (pLM) based on deep learning. Our method outperforms state-of-the-art techniques on diverse ARG datasets, including those with low homology to the training data, highlighting its potential for predicting the resistance mechanisms of unknown ARGs. Attention analysis of the model reveals that it considers biologically relevant features, such as conserved amino acid residues and antibiotic target binding sites, when making predictions. These findings provide valuable insights into the molecular basis of antibiotic resistance and demonstrate the interpretability of pLMs, offering a new perspective on their application in bioinformatics. Availability and implementation: The source code is available for free at https://github.com/hmdlab/ARG-BERT. The output results of the model are published at https://waseda.box.com/v/ARG-BERT-suppl.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae550

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Yagimoto, K., Hosoda, S., Sato, M., & Hamada, M.
Affiliations
  • Waseda University (JP)
  • Hitachi (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
Hamada, Michiaki
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2024-09-10
Volume
40
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W4402428761
Cited by
25
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
JSPS KAKENHI (JP23H00509, JP22H04925, JP20H00624)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
antibiotic resistance mechanisms, antibiotic resistance genes, protein language models, interpretability, attention analysis, conserved residues, bacterial antibiotic resistance
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Computational Biology, Drug Resistance, Bacterial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review