EuDockScore: Euclidean graph neural networks for scoring protein–protein interfaces
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Motivation: Protein–protein interactions are essential for a variety of biological phenomena including mediating biochemical reactions, cell signaling, and the immune response. Proteins seek to form interfaces which reduce overall system energy. Although determination of single polypeptide chain protein structures has been revolutionized by deep learning techniques, complex prediction has still not been perfected. Additionally, experimentally determining structures is incredibly resource and time expensive. An alternative is the technique of computational docking, which takes the solved individual structures of proteins to produce candidate interfaces (decoys). Decoys are then scored using a mathematical function that assess the quality of the system, known as scoring functions. Beyond docking, scoring functions are a critical component of assessing structures produced by many protein generative models. Scoring models are also used as a final filtering in many generative deep learning models including those that generate antibody binders, and those which perform docking. Results: In this work, we present improved scoring functions for protein–protein interactions which utilizes cutting-edge Euclidean graph neural network architectures, to assess protein–protein interfaces. These Euclidean docking score models are known as EuDockScore, and EuDockScore-Ab with the latter being antibody–antigen dock specific. Finally, we provided EuDockScore-AFM a model trained on antibody–antigen outputs from AlphaFold-Multimer (AFM) which proves useful in reranking large numbers of AFM outputs. Availability and implementation: The code for these models is available at https://gitlab.com/mcfeemat/eudockscore.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
Vreven, T., Moal, I. H., Vangone, A., Pierce, B. G., Kastritis, P. L., Torchala, M., Chaleil, R., Jiménez-García, B., Bates, P. A., Fernandez-Recio, J., et al. (2015) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2015.07.016 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Computational and artificial intelligence-based methods for antibody development
Kim, J., McFee, M., Fang, Q., Abdin, O., & Kim, P. M. (2023) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2022.12.005 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- McFee, M., Kim, J., & Kim, P. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- McFee, Matthew
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2024-10-23
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- PMC
- PMC11543620
- OpenAlex
- W4403680155
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- CIHR (PJT-159750, PJT-166008)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- protein-protein docking, scoring functions, protein-protein interfaces, antibody-antigen docking, AlphaFold-Multimer, protein complex structure prediction
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Algorithms, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology, Protein Interaction Mapping, Molecular Docking Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review