Cited by 3Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

EuDockScore: Euclidean graph neural networks for scoring protein–protein interfaces

Open access
McFee, Matthew, Kim, Jisun, Kim, Philip M·2024·Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: Protein–protein interactions are essential for a variety of biological phenomena including mediating biochemical reactions, cell signaling, and the immune response. Proteins seek to form interfaces which reduce overall system energy. Although determination of single polypeptide chain protein structures has been revolutionized by deep learning techniques, complex prediction has still not been perfected. Additionally, experimentally determining structures is incredibly resource and time expensive. An alternative is the technique of computational docking, which takes the solved individual structures of proteins to produce candidate interfaces (decoys). Decoys are then scored using a mathematical function that assess the quality of the system, known as scoring functions. Beyond docking, scoring functions are a critical component of assessing structures produced by many protein generative models. Scoring models are also used as a final filtering in many generative deep learning models including those that generate antibody binders, and those which perform docking. Results: In this work, we present improved scoring functions for protein–protein interactions which utilizes cutting-edge Euclidean graph neural network architectures, to assess protein–protein interfaces. These Euclidean docking score models are known as EuDockScore, and EuDockScore-Ab with the latter being antibody–antigen dock specific. Finally, we provided EuDockScore-AFM a model trained on antibody–antigen outputs from AlphaFold-Multimer (AFM) which proves useful in reranking large numbers of AFM outputs. Availability and implementation: The code for these models is available at https://gitlab.com/mcfeemat/eudockscore.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae636

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
McFee, M., Kim, J., & Kim, P. M.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
McFee, Matthew
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2024-10-23
Volume
40
Issue
11
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W4403680155
Cited by
3
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
CIHR (PJT-159750, PJT-166008)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein-protein docking, scoring functions, protein-protein interfaces, antibody-antigen docking, AlphaFold-Multimer, protein complex structure prediction
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Algorithms, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology, Protein Interaction Mapping, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review