ParaSurf: a surface-based deep learning approach for paratope–antigen interaction prediction
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Motivation: Identifying antibody binding sites, is crucial for developing vaccines and therapeutic antibodies, processes that are time-consuming and costly. Accurate prediction of the paratope’s binding site can speed up the development by improving our understanding of antibody–antigen interactions. Results: We present ParaSurf, a deep learning model that significantly enhances paratope prediction by incorporating both surface geometric and non-geometric factors. Trained and tested on three prominent antibody–antigen benchmarks, ParaSurf achieves state-of-the-art results across nearly all metrics. Unlike models restricted to the variable region, ParaSurf demonstrates the ability to accurately predict binding scores across the entire Fab region of the antibody. Additionally, we conducted an extensive analysis using the largest of the three datasets employed, focusing on three key components: (i) a detailed evaluation of paratope prediction for each complementarity-determining region loop, (ii) the performance of models trained exclusively on the heavy chain, and (iii) the results of training models solely on the light chain without incorporating data from the heavy chain. Availability and implementation: Source code for ParaSurf, along with the datasets used, preprocessing pipeline, and trained model weights, are freely available at https://github.com/aggelos-michael-papadopoulos/ParaSurf.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861 · see citing works
Vreven, T., Moal, I. H., Vangone, A., Pierce, B. G., Kastritis, P. L., Torchala, M., Chaleil, R., Jiménez-García, B., Bates, P. A., Fernandez-Recio, J., et al. (2015) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2015.07.016 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Krawczyk, K., Baker, T., Shi, J., & Deane, C. M. (2013) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzt043 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Papadopoulos, A.-M., Axenopoulos, A., Iatrou, A., Stamatopoulos, K., Alvarez, F., & Daras, P.
- Affiliations
- Information Technologies Institute (GR)
- Information Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas , Thessaloniki 57001,
- Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (GR)
- Institute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas , Thessaloniki 57001,
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid , Madrid 28040,
- Corresponding author
- Papadopoulos, Angelos-Michael
- Daras, Petros
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2025-02
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- PMC
- PMC11855283
- OpenAlex
- W4407284294
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 2.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Keywords
- antigen-antibody reaction, antibody binding sites, deep learning, surface geometry, Fab region, hypervariable region, heavy chain, light chain
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Antigens, Binding Sites, Antibody, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Software, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review