Cited by 23Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and Dynamics

Hybrid protein–ligand binding residue prediction with protein language models: does the structure matter?

Open access
Gamouh, Hamza, Novotný, Marian, Hoksza, David·2025·Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: Predicting protein–ligand binding sites is crucial in studying protein interactions with applications in biotechnology and drug discovery. Two distinct paradigms have emerged for this purpose: sequence-based methods, which leverage protein sequence information, and structure-based methods, which rely on the three-dimensional (3D) structure of the protein. Here, we analyze a hybrid approach that combines the strengths of both paradigms by integrating two recent deep learning architectures: protein language models (pLMs) from the sequence-based paradigm and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) from the structure-based paradigm. Specifically, we construct a residue-level Graph Attention Network (GAT) model based on the protein’s 3D structure that uses pre-trained pLM embeddings as node features. This integration enables us to study the interplay between the sequential information encoded in the protein sequence and the spatial relationships within the protein structure on the model performance. Results: By exploiting a benchmark dataset over a range of ligands and ligand types, we have shown that using the structure information consistently enhances the predictive power of the baselines in absolute terms. Nevertheless, as more complex pLMs are used to represent node features, the relative impact of the structure information represented by the GNN architecture diminishes. The above observations suggest that although the use of the experimental protein structure almost always improves the accuracy of the prediction of the binding site, complex pLMs still contain structural information that leads to good predictive performance even without the use of 3D structure. Availability and implementation: The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study, as well as pretrained models, are available in the following Zenodo link https://zenodo.org/records/15184302. The source code that was used to generate the results of the current study is available in the following GitHub repository https://github.com/hamzagamouh/pt-lm-gnn as well as in the following Zenodo link https://zenodo.org/records/15192327.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf431

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Gamouh, H., Novotný, M., & Hoksza, D.
Affiliations
  • Charles University (CZ)
  • Faculty of Science, Charles University , 128 00 Prague,
Corresponding author
Gamouh, Hamza
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2025-07-31
Volume
41
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W4412805034
Cited by
23
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
10.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Czech Science Foundation (23-07349S)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
protein-ligand binding site prediction, protein language models, graph attention networks, graph neural networks, protein 3D structure, node embeddings, ligand binding residues
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Binding Sites, Ligands, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review