Hybrid protein–ligand binding residue prediction with protein language models: does the structure matter?
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Motivation: Predicting protein–ligand binding sites is crucial in studying protein interactions with applications in biotechnology and drug discovery. Two distinct paradigms have emerged for this purpose: sequence-based methods, which leverage protein sequence information, and structure-based methods, which rely on the three-dimensional (3D) structure of the protein. Here, we analyze a hybrid approach that combines the strengths of both paradigms by integrating two recent deep learning architectures: protein language models (pLMs) from the sequence-based paradigm and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) from the structure-based paradigm. Specifically, we construct a residue-level Graph Attention Network (GAT) model based on the protein’s 3D structure that uses pre-trained pLM embeddings as node features. This integration enables us to study the interplay between the sequential information encoded in the protein sequence and the spatial relationships within the protein structure on the model performance. Results: By exploiting a benchmark dataset over a range of ligands and ligand types, we have shown that using the structure information consistently enhances the predictive power of the baselines in absolute terms. Nevertheless, as more complex pLMs are used to represent node features, the relative impact of the structure information represented by the GNN architecture diminishes. The above observations suggest that although the use of the experimental protein structure almost always improves the accuracy of the prediction of the binding site, complex pLMs still contain structural information that leads to good predictive performance even without the use of 3D structure. Availability and implementation: The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study, as well as pretrained models, are available in the following Zenodo link https://zenodo.org/records/15184302. The source code that was used to generate the results of the current study is available in the following GitHub repository https://github.com/hamzagamouh/pt-lm-gnn as well as in the following Zenodo link https://zenodo.org/records/15192327.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
ProtTrans: Toward Understanding the Language of Life Through Self-Supervised Learning
Elnaggar, A., Heinzinger, M., Dallago, C., Rehawi, G., Wang, Y., Jones, L., Gibbs, T., Feher, T., Angerer, C., Steinegger, M., et al. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3095381 · Cited by 2,329 · see citing works
Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-trained Language Models: A Survey
Min, B., Ross, H., Sulem, E., Veyseh, A. P. B., Nguyen, T. H., Sainz, O., Agirre, E., Heintz, I., & Roth, D. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3605943 · Cited by 1,387 · see citing works
Modeling the language of life – Deep Learning Protein Sequences
Heinzinger, M., Elnaggar, A., Wang, Y., Dallago, C., Nechaev, D., Matthes, F., & Rost, B. (2019) · doi:10.1101/614313 · Cited by 606 · see citing works
Protein-level assembly increases protein sequence recovery from metagenomic samples manyfold
Steinegger, M., Mirdita, M., & Söding, J. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0437-4 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Transformer protein language models are unsupervised structure learners
Rao, R., Meier, J., Sercu, T., Ovchinnikov, S., & Rives, A. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.12.15.422761 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
AlphaFold2-aware protein–DNA binding site prediction using graph transformer
Yuan, Q., Chen, S., Rao, J., Zheng, S., Zhao, H., & Yang, Y. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbab564 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
DeepDrug3D: Classification of ligand-binding pockets in proteins with a convolutional neural network
Pu, L., Govindaraj, R. G., Lemoine, J. M., Wu, H.-C., & Brylinski, M. (2019) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006718 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Gamouh, H., Novotný, M., & Hoksza, D.
- Affiliations
- Charles University (CZ)
- Faculty of Science, Charles University , 128 00 Prague,
- Corresponding author
- Gamouh, Hamza
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2025-07-31
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- PMC
- PMC12377911
- OpenAlex
- W4412805034
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 10.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Czech Science Foundation (23-07349S)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- protein-ligand binding site prediction, protein language models, graph attention networks, graph neural networks, protein 3D structure, node embeddings, ligand binding residues
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Binding Sites, Ligands, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review