HINN prioritizes multi-omics biomarkers associated with cognitive decline
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Integrating multi-omics data for disease prediction remains challenging due to the complexity of cross-layer biological interactions and the limited use of prior biological knowledge in many machine learning models. We present the Hierarchical Input Neural Network (HINN), a deep learning framework that incorporates biologically informed connections across genomic, epigenetic, and transcriptomic layers to model regulatory relationships in a structured and interpretable manner. HINN was applied to blood-derived multi-omics data to predict cognitive assessment scores, including MMSE, MoCA, ADAS11, and RAVLT.Immediate. A biologically guided feature construction pipeline was used to integrate GWAS-derived SNPs, promoter-region DNA methylation, and gene expression data through Gene Ontology Biological Process (GO-BP) and KEGG pathway mappings. Results: The model was evaluated using a rigorous training strategy that separates feature selection from testing and incorporates cross-validation as well as repeated runs to ensure robustness. Across all cognitive outcomes, HINN achieved the lowest mean normalized MSE among the evaluated models, with statistically significant improvements over most baseline methods. Ablation analyses showed that the contributions of individual omics modalities and biologically informed connectivity varied across cognitive outcomes, with the clearest benefits of structured connectivity observed for ADAS11 and MMSE. Feature attribution analysis identified a multi-omics cascade involving SNP (rs116557230), CpG site (cg24041822), and a SOCS4 gene expression probe, which showed consistent associations with multiple cognitive outcomes. These findings highlight the ability of HINN to uncover biologically meaningful cross-omics relationships relevant to cognitive decline. Together, this work demonstrates that integrating deep learning with biological knowledge enables biomarker discovery for complex diseases. Availability and Implementation: All code, sample data, and instructions are publicly available via GitHub (https://github.com/bozdaglab/HINN) and archived on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19197057) to ensure reproducibility and long-term accessibility. Supplementary Information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
- Authors
- Vashishath, Y., Beaver, S. A., Saeed, F., & Bozdag, S.
- Affiliations
- University of North Texas (US)
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of North Texas , Denton, TX 76203,
- Florida International University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Vashishath, Yashu
- Bozdag, Serdar
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2026-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- PMC
- PMC13684270
- OpenAlex
- W7220840327
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences
- National Institutes of Health (R35GM133657)
- NIGMS (R35GM153434)
- University of North Texas
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- cognitive decline, multi-omics integration, biomarker discovery, DNA methylation, gene expression, single nucleotide polymorphisms, SOCS4, Alzheimer's disease
- MeSH terms
- Multiomics, Humans, Biomarkers, Neural Networks, Computer, DNA Methylation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genomics, Genome-Wide Association Study, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review