Cited by 0Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic diversity and population structure

LoGicAl: Local ancestry and genotype calling uncertainty-aware ancestry-specific allele frequency estimation from admixed samples

Open access
Wang, Jiongming, Zöllner, Sebastian·2026·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: In admixed groups, it is of interest to estimate allele frequencies of their ancestral contributing populations. These ancestry-specific allele frequencies inform genetic drivers of disease etiologies, facilitate genome-wide association study interpretations, enhance polygenic risk prediction and portability, and provide insights into demographic history. Their estimation leverages inferred locus-specific ancestry background, i.e., local ancestry, generated by tools like RFMix. However, existing estimation methods lose accuracy and incur biases by failing to model uncertainty from upstream local ancestry inference and genotype calling. Results: Here, we introduce LoGicAl, a novel likelihood-based method for estimating ancestry-specific allele frequencies from admixed samples, simultaneously accommodating uncertainty from ancestry calling, genotyping, and statistical phasing. We demonstrate that modeling these uncertainties substantially reduces estimation errors, resulting in superior accuracy for both sequence-based and array-based genotyping with different levels of local ancestry inference quality. By integrating an accelerated fixed-point algorithm, LoGicAl achieves high scalability and enhanced computational efficiency compared with existing approaches. Applying LoGicAl to admixed cohorts in the 1000 Genomes Project, we illustrate the benefits of local-ancestry-based allele frequency estimates. Together, LoGicAl contributes to genomic analyses of admixed samples by providing precise and rapid ancestry-specific allele frequency estimates, and to constructing the spatial landscape and dynamics of genetic variations in admixed populations at a finer scale. Availability: The LoGicAl software is available at https://github.com/student-jw/LoGicAl.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btag752

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48

Authors
Wang, J., & Zöllner, S.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Zöllner, Sebastian
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2026-10
Volume
42
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W7221354187
Cited by
0
References
48
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
local ancestry, admixed populations, likelihood estimation, fixed point iteration, phasing, 1000 Genomes Project, admixture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review