LRP2: A proteogenomics pipeline for long-read informed protein isoform analysis and discovery
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Most human genes produce multiple RNA isoforms, yet it remains unclear which isoforms are translated into stable, functional proteins. Long-read RNA sequencing resolves full-length transcript structures and, when paired with mass spectrometry, can provide empirical evidence of isoform translation. Despite this opportunity, comprehensive workflows integrating isoform discovery, open reading frame prediction, peptide identification, and protein inference remain limited, leaving users to handle these steps piecemeal. Here, we present LRP2, a modular, end-to-end long-read proteogenomics pipeline built in Nextflow. LRP2 scales transcript discovery to hundreds of samples via PacBio’s latest Isocall tool, removes technical artifacts with SQANTI QC, generates and classifies predicted proteomes via CPAT and SQANTI Protein, performs multi-group differential expression and usage analysis via edgeR, DRIMSeq, and a long-read adaptation of LeafCutter, and integrates protein-level evidence from DDA and DIA MS data through FragPipe. For cross-dataset comparison of novel isoforms, LRP2 employs deterministic splice-junction, coordinate-based isoform identifiers. Used as an integrated pipeline, LRP2 enables the detection of novel peptides and improves protein isoform inference to confirm protein isoform translation. Availability and Implementation: LRP2 is freely available as a modular Nextflow pipeline at https://github.com/sheynkman-lab/LRP2 (v2.0.0, archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22795865). LRP2 supports Docker, Apptainer/Singularity, and Conda environments with GENCODE references. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
- Authors
- Schertzer, M. D., Lewandowski, J. T., Watts, E. F., Rosenow, W., Mehlferber, M. M., Jeffery, E. D., Adamson, S. I., Bruand, J., Tseng, E., Neelamraju, Y., Garrett-Bakelman, F. E., Dolzhenko, E., Knowles, D. A., & Sheynkman, G.
- Affiliations
- New York Genome Center (US)
- University of Virginia (US)
- Pacific Biosciences (United States) (US)
- University of Virginia Cancer Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schertzer, Megan D
- Knowles, David A
- Sheynkman, Gloria
- ORCID
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2026-10-22
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W7223311974
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (NCI R33 CA281919, NIGMS R35 GM142647)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Keywords
- proteogenomics, protein isoforms, long-read RNA sequencing, isoform discovery, open reading frame prediction, peptide identification, protein inference, differential isoform usage, differential gene expression, Nextflow pipeline, Leafcutter, FragPipe
- MeSH terms
- Proteogenomics, Humans, Software, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Protein Isoforms, Proteome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review