The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis and prediction of DNA-binding proteins and their binding residues based on composition, sequence and structural information
Abstract
Motivation: Though vitally important to cell function, the mechanism of protein–DNA binding has not yet been completely understood. We therefore analysed the relationship between DNA binding and protein sequence composition, solvent accessibility and secondary structure. Using non-redundant databases of transcription factors and protein–DNA complexes, neural network models were developed to utilize the information present in this relationship to predict DNA-binding proteins and their binding residues. Results: Sequence composition was found to provide sufficient information to predict the probability of its binding to DNA with nearly 69% sensitivity at 64% accuracy for the considered proteins; sequence neighbourhood and solvent accessibility information were sufficient to make binding site predictions with 40% sensitivity at 79% accuracy. Detailed analysis of binding residues shows that some three- and five-residue segments frequently bind to DNA and that solvent accessibility plays a major role in binding. Although, binding behaviour was not associated with any particular secondary structure, there were interesting exceptions at the residue level. Over-representation of some residues in the binding sites was largely lost at the total sequence level, but a different kind of compositional preference was observed in DNA-binding proteins. Availability: Online predictions of DNA-binding proteins and binding sites are available at http://www.netasa.org/dbs-pred/
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
Cited by
Performance of mutation pathogenicity prediction methods on missense variants
Thusberg, J., Olatubosun, A., & Vihinen, M. (2011) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.21445 · Cited by 537
ASAView: Database and tool for solvent accessibility representation in proteins
Ahmad, S., Gromiha, M., Fawareh, H., & Sarai, A. (2004) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-5-51 · Cited by 283
Self-citationIdentification of DNA-binding proteins using support vector machines and evolutionary profiles
Kumar, M., Gromiha, M. M., & Raghava, G. P. (2007) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-463 · Cited by 278
Self-citationPSSM-based prediction of DNA binding sites in proteins
Ahmad, S., & Sarai, A. (2005) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-6-33 · Cited by 271
Self-citationAn overview of the prediction of protein DNA-binding sites
Si, J., Zhao, R., & Wu, R. (2015) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms16035194 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahmad, S., Gromiha, M. M., & Sarai, A.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-01-22
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 477-486
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2096986143
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis and prediction of DNA-binding proteins and their binding residues based on composition, sequence and structural information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg432
- The paper
- Ahmad, S., Gromiha, M. M., & Sarai, A. (2004). Analysis and prediction of DNA-binding proteins and their binding residues based on composition, sequence and structural information. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg432
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.