The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Predicting subcellular localization of proteins using machine-learned classifiers
Abstract
Motivation: Identifying the destination or localization of proteins is key to understanding their function and facilitating their purification. A number of existing computational prediction methods are based on sequence analysis. However, these methods are limited in scope, accuracy and most particularly breadth of coverage. Rather than using sequence information alone, we have explored the use of database text annotations from homologs and machine learning to substantially improve the prediction of subcellular location. Results: We have constructed five machine-learning classifiers for predicting subcellular localization of proteins from animals, plants, fungi, Gram-negative bacteria and Gram-positive bacteria, which are 81% accurate for fungi and 92–94% accurate for the other four categories. These are the most accurate subcellular predictors across the widest set of organisms ever published. Our predictors are part of the Proteome Analyst web-service. Availability: http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/~bioinfo/PA/Sub, http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/~bioinfo/PA Supplementary information: http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/~bioinfo/PA/Subcellular
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A protocol for generating a high-quality genome-scale metabolic reconstruction
Thiele, I., & Palsson, B. Ø. (2010) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2009.203 · Cited by 1,789
Kislinger, T., Cox, B., Kannan, A., Chung, C., Hu, P., Ignatchenko, A., Scott, M. S., Gramolini, A. O., Morris, Q., Hallett, M. T., et al. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.044 · Cited by 482
Proteomics in gram‐negative bacterial outer membrane vesicles
Lee, E., Choi, D., Kim, K., & Gho, Y. S. (2008) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.20175 · Cited by 339
Prediction of human protein subcellular localization using deep learning
Wei, L., Ding, Y., Su, R., Tang, J., & Zou, Q. (2018) · Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing · doi:10.1016/j.jpdc.2017.08.009 · Cited by 216
Barsky, A., Gardy, J. L., Hancock, R. E. W., & Munzner, T. (2007) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm057 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, Z., Szafron, D., Greiner, R., Lu, P., Wishart, D. S., Poulin, B., Anvik, J., Macdonell, C., & Eisner, R.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-01-22
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 547-556
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2151790371
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting subcellular localization of proteins using machine-learned classifiers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg447
- The paper
- Lu, Z., Szafron, D., Greiner, R., Lu, P., Wishart, D. S., Poulin, B., Anvik, J., Macdonell, C., & Eisner, R. (2004). Predicting subcellular localization of proteins using machine-learned classifiers. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg447
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.