The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Using amphiphilic pseudo amino acid composition to predict enzyme subfamily classes
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: With protein sequences entering into databanks at an explosive pace, the early determination of the family or subfamily class for a newly found enzyme molecule becomes important because this is directly related to the detailed information about which specific target it acts on, as well as to its catalytic process and biological function. Unfortunately, it is both time-consuming and costly to do so by experiments alone. In a previous study, the covariant-discriminant algorithm was introduced to identify the 16 subfamily classes of oxidoreductases. Although the results were quite encouraging, the entire prediction process was based on the amino acid composition alone without including any sequence-order information. Therefore, it is worthy of further investigation. Results: To incorporate the sequence-order effects into the predictor, the ‘amphiphilic pseudo amino acid composition’ is introduced to represent the statistical sample of a protein. The novel representation contains 20 + 2λ discrete numbers: the first 20 numbers are the components of the conventional amino acid composition; the next 2λ numbers are a set of correlation factors that reflect different hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity distribution patterns along a protein chain. Based on such a concept and formulation scheme, a new predictor is developed. It is shown by the self-consistency test, jackknife test and independent dataset tests that the success rates obtained by the new predictor are all significantly higher than those by the previous predictors. The significant enhancement in success rates also implies that the distribution of hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity of the amino acid residues along a protein chain plays a very important role to its structure and function. Contact: kchou@san.rr.com
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Some remarks on protein attribute prediction and pseudo amino acid composition
Chou, K.-C. (2011) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.12.024 · Cited by 1,225
Self-citationLiu, B., Liu, F., Wang, X., Chen, J., Fang, L., & Chou, K.-C. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv458 · Cited by 721
Self-citationLin, H., Deng, E.-Z., Ding, H., Chen, W., & Chou, K.-C. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku1019 · Cited by 508
Self-citationGuo, S.-H., Deng, E.-Z., Xu, L.-Q., Ding, H., Lin, H., Chen, W., & Chou, K.-C. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu083 · Cited by 375
Self-citationLiu, B. (2019) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbx165 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Chou, K.-C.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-08-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-19
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2132292391
- Cited by
- 993
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using amphiphilic pseudo amino acid composition to predict enzyme subfamily classes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth466
- The paper
- Chou, K.-C. (2005). Using amphiphilic pseudo amino acid composition to predict enzyme subfamily classes. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth466
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.