The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting protein–protein interactions using signature products
Abstract
Motivation: Proteome-wide prediction of protein–protein interaction is a difficult and important problem in biology. Although there have been recent advances in both experimental and computational methods for predicting protein–protein interactions, we are only beginning to see a confluence of these techniques. In this paper, we describe a very general, high-throughput method for predicting protein–protein interactions. Our method combines a sequence-based description of proteins with experimental information that can be gathered from any type of protein–protein interaction screen. The method uses a novel description of interacting proteins by extending the signature descriptor, which has demonstrated success in predicting peptide/protein binding interactions for individual proteins. This descriptor is extended to protein pairs by taking signature products. The signature product is implemented within a support vector machine classifier as a kernel function. Results: We have applied our method to publicly available yeast, Helicobacter pylori, human and mouse datasets. We used the yeast and H.pylori datasets to verify the predictive ability of our method, achieving from 70 to 80% accuracy rates using 10-fold cross-validation. We used the human and mouse datasets to demonstrate that our method is capable of cross-species prediction. Finally, we reused the yeast dataset to explore the ability of our algorithm to predict domains. Contact: smartin@sandia.gov.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wu, Y. (1999) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1999.10485951 · Cited by 27,221
A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition
Burges, C. J. C. (1998) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1023/a:1009715923555 · Cited by 16,429
A tutorial on support vector regression
Smola, A. J., & Schölkopf, B. (2004) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1023/b:stco.0000035301.49549.88 · Cited by 13,387
A novel genetic system to detect protein–protein interactions
Fields, S., & Song, O.-K. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/340245a0 · Cited by 6,114
Advances in kernel methods: support vector learning
Schölkopf, B., Burges, C. J. C., & Smola, A. J. (1999) · doi:10.5555/299094 · Cited by 5,789
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
Making Large-Scale SVM Learning Practical
Joachims, T. (1998) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.17877/de290r-14262 · Cited by 4,411
An Introduction to Support Vector Machines
Cristianini, N., & Shawe-Taylor, J. S. (2000) · ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) · Cited by 4,115
The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003
Boeckmann, B. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkg095 · Cited by 3,890
Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry
Ho, Y., Gruhler, A., Heilbut, A., Bader, G. D., Moore, L., Adams, S.-L., Millar, A., Taylor, P., Bennett, K., Boutilier, K., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415180a · Cited by 3,601
Cited by
Guo, Y., Yu, L., Wen, Z., & Li, M. (2008) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn159 · Cited by 697
Kernel methods for predicting protein-protein interactions
Ben-Hur, A., & Noble, W. S. (2005) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1016 · Cited by 561
Sequence-based prediction of protein protein interaction using a deep-learning algorithm
Sun, T., Zhou, B., Lai, L., & Pei, J. (2017) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-017-1700-2 · Cited by 375
Predicting protein–protein interactions through sequence-based deep learning
Hashemifar, S., Neyshabur, B., Khan, A. A., & Xu, J. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty573 · Cited by 367
Shoemaker, B. A., & Panchenko, A. R. (2007) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030043 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, S., Roe, D., & Faulon, J.-L.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-09-17
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 218-226
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2150452800
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 4.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting protein–protein interactions using signature products. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth483
- The paper
- Martin, S., Roe, D., & Faulon, J.-L. (2005). Predicting protein–protein interactions using signature products. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth483
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.