The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A computational approach toward label-free protein quantification using predicted peptide detectability
Abstract
Summary: We propose here a new concept of peptide detectability which could be an important factor in explaining the relationship between a protein's quantity and the peptides identified from it in a high-throughput proteomics experiment. We define peptide detectability as the probability of observing a peptide in a standard sample analyzed by a standard proteomics routine and argue that it is an intrinsic property of the peptide sequence and neighboring regions in the parent protein. To test this hypothesis we first used publicly available data and data from our own synthetic samples in which quantities of model proteins were controlled. We then applied machine learning approaches to demonstrate that peptide detectability can be predicted from its sequence and the neighboring regions in the parent protein with satisfactory accuracy. The utility of this approach for protein quantification is demonstrated by peptides with higher detectability generally being identified at lower concentrations over those with lower detectability in the synthetic protein mixtures. These results establish a direct link between protein concentration and peptide detectability. We show that for each protein there exists a level of peptide detectability above which peptides are detected and below which peptides are not detected in an experiment. We call this level the minimum acceptable detectability for identified peptides (MDIP) which can be calibrated to predict protein concentration. Triplicate analysis of a biological sample showed that these MDIP values are consistent among the three data sets. Contact: predrag@indiana.edu
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A direct adaptive method for faster backpropagation learning: the RPROP algorithm
Riedmiller, M., & Braun, H. (2002) · IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/icnn.1993.298623 · Cited by 3,917
Interpretation of Shotgun Proteomic Data
Nesvizhskii, A. I., & Aebersold, R. (2005) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r500012-mcp200 · Cited by 1,025
Cited by
mRNAs, proteins and the emerging principles of gene expression control
Buccitelli, C., & Selbach, M. (2020) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-0258-4 · Cited by 1,243
Selected reaction monitoring–based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions
Picotti, P., & Aebersold, R. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2015 · Cited by 1,302
Lu, P., Vogel, C., Wang, R., Yao, X., & Marcotte, E. M. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1270 · Cited by 1,139
Desiere, F. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj040 · Cited by 910
A High-Confidence Human Plasma Proteome Reference Set with Estimated Concentrations in PeptideAtlas
Farrah, T., Deutsch, E. W., Omenn, G. S., Campbell, D. S., Sun, Z., Bletz, J. A., Mallick, P., Katz, J. E., Malmström, J., Ossola, R., et al. (2011) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m110.006353 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Tang, H., Arnold, R. J., Alves, P., Xun, Z., Clemmer, D. E., Novotny, M. V., Reilly, J. P., & Radivojac, P.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-07-15
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- e481-e488
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2155553629
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A computational approach toward label-free protein quantification using predicted peptide detectability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl237
- The paper
- Tang, H., Arnold, R. J., Alves, P., Xun, Z., Clemmer, D. E., Novotny, M. V., Reilly, J. P., & Radivojac, P. (2006). A computational approach toward label-free protein quantification using predicted peptide detectability. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl237
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.