The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Chado case study: an ontology-based modular schema for representing genome-associated biological information
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: A few years ago, FlyBase undertook to design a new database schema to store Drosophila data. It would fully integrate genomic sequence and annotation data with bibliographic, genetic, phenotypic and molecular data from the literature representing a distillation of the first 100 years of research on this major animal model system. In developing this new integrated schema, FlyBase also made a commitment to ensure that its design was generic, extensible and available as open source, so that it could be employed as the core schema of any model organism data repository, thereby avoiding redundant software development and potentially increasing interoperability. Our question was whether we could create a relational database schema that would be successfully reused. Results: Chado is a relational database schema now being used to manage biological knowledge for a wide variety of organisms, from human to pathogens, especially the classes of information that directly or indirectly can be associated with genome sequences or the primary RNA and protein products encoded by a genome. Biological databases that conform to this schema can interoperate with one another, and with application software from the Generic Model Organism Database (GMOD) toolkit. Chado is distinctive because its design is driven by ontologies. The use of ontologies (or controlled vocabularies) is ubiquitous across the schema, as they are used as a means of typing entities. The Chado schema is partitioned into integrated subschemas (modules), each encapsulating a different biological domain, and each described using representations in appropriate ontologies. To illustrate this methodology, we describe here the Chado modules used for describing genomic sequences. Availability: GMOD is a collaboration of several model organism database groups, including FlyBase, to develop a set of open-source software for managing model organism data. The Chado schema is freely distributed under the terms of the Artistic License (http://www.opensource.org/licenses/artistic-license.php) from GMOD (www.gmod.org). Contact: cjm@fruitfly.org or emmert@morgan.harvard.edu.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bard, J., Rhee, S. Y., & Ashburner, M. (2005) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2005-6-2-r21 · Cited by 416
Cited by
Holt, C., & Yandell, M. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-491 · Cited by 2,118
Genome Sequence of the Pea Aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum
The International Aphid Genomics Consortium (2010) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000313 · Cited by 1,314
Self-citationPomBase: a comprehensive online resource for fission yeast
Wood, V., Harris, M. A., McDowall, M. D., Rutherford, K., Vaughan, B. W., Staines, D. M., Aslett, M., Lock, A., Bahler, J., Kersey, P. J., et al. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr853 · Cited by 321
Cormier, A., Avia, K., Sterck, L., Derrien, T., Wucher, V., Andres, G., Monsoor, M., Godfroy, O., Lipinska, A., Perrineau, M., et al. (2017) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14321 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Mungall, C. J., Emmert, D. B., & The FlyBase Consortium
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-07-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- i337-i346
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2151397621
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Chado case study: an ontology-based modular schema for representing genome-associated biological information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm189
- The paper
- Mungall, C. J., Emmert, D. B., & The FlyBase Consortium. (2007). A Chado case study: an ontology-based modular schema for representing genome-associated biological information. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm189
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.