The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identifying gene-disease associations using centrality on a literature mined gene-interaction network
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Understanding the role of genetics in diseases is one of the most important aims of the biological sciences. The completion of the Human Genome Project has led to a rapid increase in the number of publications in this area. However, the coverage of curated databases that provide information manually extracted from the literature is limited. Another challenge is that determining disease-related genes requires laborious experiments. Therefore, predicting good candidate genes before experimental analysis will save time and effort. We introduce an automatic approach based on text mining and network analysis to predict gene-disease associations. We collected an initial set of known disease-related genes and built an interaction network by automatic literature mining based on dependency parsing and support vector machines. Our hypothesis is that the central genes in this disease-specific network are likely to be related to the disease. We used the degree, eigenvector, betweenness and closeness centrality metrics to rank the genes in the network. Results: The proposed approach can be used to extract known and to infer unknown gene-disease associations. We evaluated the approach for prostate cancer. Eigenvector and degree centrality achieved high accuracy. A total of 95% of the top 20 genes ranked by these methods are confirmed to be related to prostate cancer. On the other hand, betweenness and closeness centrality predicted more genes whose relation to the disease is currently unknown and are candidates for experimental study. Availability: A web-based system for browsing the disease-specific gene-interaction networks is available at: http://gin.ncibi.org Contact: radev@umich.edu
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, C. F. G. R., Lander, E. S., Linton, L. M., Birren, B., Nusbaum, C., Zody, M. C., Baldwin, J., Devon, K., Dewar, K., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35057062 · Cited by 24,216
The Structure and Function of Complex Networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2003) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s003614450342480 · Cited by 18,719
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
The sequence of the human genome
Venter, J. C., Adams, M. D., Myers, E. W., Li, P. W., Mural, R. J., Sutton, G. G., Smith, H. O., Yandell, M., Evans, C. A., Holt, R. A., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058040 · Cited by 13,909
(1999) · Cited by 12,854
Statistical Methods for Research Workers
(1945) · American Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1093/ajcp/15.11.552b · Cited by 10,880
A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness
Freeman, L. C. (1977) · Sociometry · doi:10.2307/3033543 · Cited by 10,295
Advances in kernel methods: support vector learning
Schölkopf, B., Burges, C. J. C., & Smola, A. J. (1999) · doi:10.5555/299094 · Cited by 5,789
Cited by
Bravo, À., Piñero, J., Queralt-Rosinach, N., Rautschka, M., & Furlong, L. I. (2015) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0472-9 · Cited by 264
AMELIE speeds Mendelian diagnosis by matching patient phenotype and genotype to primary literature
Birgmeier, J., Haeussler, M., Deisseroth, C. A., Steinberg, E. H., Jagadeesh, K. A., Ratner, A. J., Guturu, H., Wenger, A. M., Diekhans, M. E., Stenson, P. D., et al. (2020) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aau9113 · Cited by 118
A Survey of Gene Prioritization Tools for Mendelian and Complex Human Diseases
Zolotareva, O., & Kleine, M. (2019) · Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics · doi:10.1515/jib-2018-0069 · Cited by 46
Mapping of molecular pathways, biomarkers and drug targets for diabetic nephropathy
Fechete, R., Heinzel, A., Perco, P., Mönks, K., Söllner, J., Stelzer, G., Eder, S., Lancet, D., Oberbauer, R., Mayer, G., et al. (2011) · PROTEOMICS – Clinical Applications · doi:10.1002/prca.201000136 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Özgür, A., Vu, T., Erkan, G., & Radev, D. R.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-07-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- i277-i285
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2161604082
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 7.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying gene-disease associations using centrality on a literature mined gene-interaction network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn182
- The paper
- Özgür, A., Vu, T., Erkan, G., & Radev, D. R. (2008). Identifying gene-disease associations using centrality on a literature mined gene-interaction network. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn182
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.