The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of RNA secondary structure using generalized centroid estimators
Abstract
Motivation: Recent studies have shown that the methods for predicting secondary structures of RNAs on the basis of posterior decoding of the base-pairing probabilities has an advantage with respect to prediction accuracy over the conventionally utilized minimum free energy methods. However, there is room for improvement in the objective functions presented in previous studies, which are maximized in the posterior decoding with respect to the accuracy measures for secondary structures. Results: We propose novel estimators which improve the accuracy of secondary structure prediction of RNAs. The proposed estimators maximize an objective function which is the weighted sum of the expected number of the true positives and that of the true negatives of the base pairs. The proposed estimators are also improved versions of the ones used in previous works, namely CONTRAfold for secondary structure prediction from a single RNA sequence and McCaskill-MEA for common secondary structure prediction from multiple alignments of RNA sequences. We clarify the relations between the proposed estimators and the estimators presented in previous works, and theoretically show that the previous estimators include additional unnecessary terms in the evaluation measures with respect to the accuracy. Furthermore, computational experiments confirm the theoretical analysis by indicating improvement in the empirical accuracy. The proposed estimators represent extensions of the centroid estimators proposed in Ding et al. and Carvalho and Lawrence, and are applicable to a wide variety of problems in bioinformatics. Availability: Supporting information and the CentroidFold software are available online at: http://www.ncrna.org/software/centroidfold/. Contact: hamada-michiaki@aist.go.jp Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Accelerated Evolution of Conserved Noncoding Sequences in Humans
Prabhakar, S., Noonan, J. P., Pääbo, S., & Rubin, E. M. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1130738 · Cited by 481
Cited by
Lorenz, R., Bernhart, S. H., Höner zu Siederdissen, C., Tafer, H., Flamm, C., Stadler, P. F., & Hofacker, I. L. (2011) · Algorithms for Molecular Biology · doi:10.1186/1748-7188-6-26 · Cited by 5,098
Nagashima, Y., Mishiba, K.-I., Suzuki, E., Shimada, Y., Iwata, Y., & Koizumi, N. (2011) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00029 · Cited by 337
CENTROIDFOLD: a web server for RNA secondary structure prediction
Sato, K., Hamada, M., Asai, K., & Mituyama, T. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp367 · Cited by 334
Self-citationSato, K., Kato, Y., Hamada, M., Akutsu, T., & Asai, K. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr215 · Cited by 331
Self-citationRivas, E., Lang, R., & Eddy, S. R. (2012) · RNA · doi:10.1261/rna.030049.111 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamada, M., Kiryu, H., Sato, K., Mituyama, T., & Asai, K.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-12-18
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 465-473
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2101497682
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of RNA secondary structure using generalized centroid estimators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn601
- The paper
- Hamada, M., Kiryu, H., Sato, K., Mituyama, T., & Asai, K. (2009). Prediction of RNA secondary structure using generalized centroid estimators. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn601
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.