Cited by 785Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyStatistical Methods and InferenceGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Genome-wide association analysis by lasso penalized logistic regression

Open access
Wu, Tong Tong, Chen, Yi Fang, Hastie, Trevor, Sobel, Eric, Lange, Kenneth·2009·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: In ordinary regression, imposition of a lasso penalty makes continuous model selection straightforward. Lasso penalized regression is particularly advantageous when the number of predictors far exceeds the number of observations. Method: The present article evaluates the performance of lasso penalized logistic regression in case–control disease gene mapping with a large number of SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) predictors. The strength of the lasso penalty can be tuned to select a predetermined number of the most relevant SNPs and other predictors. For a given value of the tuning constant, the penalized likelihood is quickly maximized by cyclic coordinate ascent. Once the most potent marginal predictors are identified, their two-way and higher order interactions can also be examined by lasso penalized logistic regression. Results: This strategy is tested on both simulated and real data. Our findings on coeliac disease replicate the previous SNP results and shed light on possible interactions among the SNPs. Availability: The software discussed is available in Mendel 9.0 at the UCLA Human Genetics web site. Contact: klange@ucla.edu Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp041

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The elastic net algorithm was used because penalization improves prediction accuracy and maintains clinical interpretability compared with less transparent machine learning algorithms.

    “We used the elastic net algorithm, given substantial evidence that penalization improves prediction accuracy,25–27 alongside its well-established accuracy and robustness28,29 and ability to maintain clinical interpretability compared with less transparent machine learning algorithms (eg, random forests, neural networks).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 35 · Cited by 785

Authors
Wu, T. T., Chen, Y. F., Hastie, T., Sobel, E., & Lange, K.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Lange, Kenneth
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2009-01-28
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
714-721
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2122189635
Cited by
785
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 66 · 2012: 60
FWCI
28.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (MH59490, GM53275)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH59490)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM053275, GM 53275)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
genome-wide association study, single nucleotide polymorphisms, gene mapping, interaction analysis, celiac disease, high-dimensional regression
MeSH terms
Software, Logistic Models, Computational Biology, Internet, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review