The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FoldAmyloid: a method of prediction of amyloidogenic regions from protein sequence
Abstract
Motivation: Amyloidogenic regions in polypeptide chains are very important because such regions are responsible for amyloid formation and aggregation. It is useful to be able to predict positions of amyloidogenic regions in protein chains. Results: Two characteristics (expected probability of hydrogen bonds formation and expected packing density of residues) have been introduced by us to detect amyloidogenic regions in a protein sequence. We demonstrate that regions with high expected probability of the formation of backbone–backbone hydrogen bonds as well as regions with high expected packing density are mostly responsible for the formation of amyloid fibrils. Our method (FoldAmyloid) has been tested on a dataset of 407 peptides (144 amyloidogenic and 263 non-amyloidogenic peptides) and has shown good performance in predicting a peptide status: amyloidogenic or non-amyloidogenic. The prediction based on the expected packing density classified correctly 75% of amyloidogenic peptides and 74% of non-amyloidogenic ones. Two variants (averaging by donors and by acceptors) of prediction based on the probability of formation of backbone–backbone hydrogen bonds gave a comparable efficiency. With a hybrid-scale constructed by merging the above three scales, our method is correct for 80% of amyloidogenic peptides and for 72% of non-amyloidogenic ones. Prediction of amyloidogenic regions in proteins where positions of amyloidogenic regions are known from experimental data has also been done. In the proteins, our method correctly finds 10 out of 11 amyloidogenic regions. Availability: The FoldAmyloid server is available at http://antares.protres.ru/fold-amyloid/ Contact: ogalzit@vega.protres.ru
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
Cited by
Chowdhury, S., & Kumar, S. (2020) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2020.103892 · Cited by 69
Sharma, S., Nehru, B., & Saini, A. (2017) · Neurochemistry International · doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2017.06.011 · Cited by 48
Hossain, S., Hashimoto, M., Katakura, M., Al Mamun, A., & Shido, O. (2015) · BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12906-015-0620-9 · Cited by 38
VIPdb, a genetic variant impact predictor database
Hu, Z., Yu, C., Furutsuki, M., Andreoletti, G., Ly, M., Hoskins, R., Adhikari, A. N., & Brenner, S. E. (2019) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.23858 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Garbuzynskiy, S. O., Lobanov, M. Y., & Galzitskaya, O. V.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-12-17
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 326-332
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2157873167
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FoldAmyloid: a method of prediction of amyloidogenic regions from protein sequence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp691
- The paper
- Garbuzynskiy, S. O., Lobanov, M. Y., & Galzitskaya, O. V. (2010). FoldAmyloid: a method of prediction of amyloidogenic regions from protein sequence. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp691
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.