Cited by 2,337Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesChromosomal and Genetic VariationsAlgorithms and Data Compression

Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE.

Open access
Boetzer, Marten, Henkel, Christiaan V., Jansen, Hans J., Butler, Derek, Pirovano, Walter·2011·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Summary: De novo assembly tools play a main role in reconstructing genomes from next-generation sequencing (NGS) data and usually yield a number of contigs. Using paired-read sequencing data it is possible to assess the order, distance and orientation of contigs and combine them into so-called scaffolds. Although the latter process is a crucial step in finishing genomes, scaffolding algorithms are often built-in functions in de novo assembly tools and cannot be independently controlled. We here present a new tool, called SSPACE, which is a stand-alone scaffolder of pre-assembled contigs using paired-read data. Main features are: a short runtime, multiple library input of paired-end and/or mate pair datasets and possible contig extension with unmapped sequence reads. SSPACE shows promising results on both prokaryote and eukaryote genomic testsets where the amount of initial contigs was reduced by at least 75%. Availability: www.baseclear.com/bioinformatics-tools/. Contact: walter.pirovano@baseclear.com Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq683

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 6 · Cited by 2,337

Authors
Boetzer, M., Henkel, C. V., Jansen, H. J., Butler, D., & Pirovano, W.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Pirovano, Walter
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2010-12-12
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
578-579
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2129744420
Cited by
2,337
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 152 · 2021: 237 · 2020: 213 · 2019: 226 · 2018: 253 · 2017: 251 · 2016: 208 · 2015: 199 · 2014: 147 · 2013: 86 · 2012: 55
FWCI
19.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Algorithms and Data Compression
Keywords
scaffolding, contig ordering, paired-end reads, de novo assembly, prokaryotic genomes, eukaryotic genomes
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Software, Gene Library, Genome, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Contig Mapping, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review