Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE.
Open accessAbstract
Summary: De novo assembly tools play a main role in reconstructing genomes from next-generation sequencing (NGS) data and usually yield a number of contigs. Using paired-read sequencing data it is possible to assess the order, distance and orientation of contigs and combine them into so-called scaffolds. Although the latter process is a crucial step in finishing genomes, scaffolding algorithms are often built-in functions in de novo assembly tools and cannot be independently controlled. We here present a new tool, called SSPACE, which is a stand-alone scaffolder of pre-assembled contigs using paired-read data. Main features are: a short runtime, multiple library input of paired-end and/or mate pair datasets and possible contig extension with unmapped sequence reads. SSPACE shows promising results on both prokaryote and eukaryote genomic testsets where the amount of initial contigs was reduced by at least 75%. Availability: www.baseclear.com/bioinformatics-tools/. Contact: walter.pirovano@baseclear.com Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Scaffolding the final assembly by using SSPACE merged only a small portion of the transcripts.
“We also carried out scaffolding the final assembly by using SSPACE [54], but only a small portion of the transcripts could be merged (data not shown).”
From Digital Gene Expression Analysis Based on Integrated De Novo Transcriptome Assembly of Sweet Potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] (2012) · cites this paper as [54]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 6 · Cited by 2,337
- Authors
- Boetzer, M., Henkel, C. V., Jansen, H. J., Butler, D., & Pirovano, W.
- Affiliations
- Leiden University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Pirovano, Walter
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-12-12
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 578-579
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2129744420
- Cited by
- 2,337
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 152 · 2021: 237 · 2020: 213 · 2019: 226 · 2018: 253 · 2017: 251 · 2016: 208 · 2015: 199 · 2014: 147 · 2013: 86 · 2012: 55
- FWCI
- 19.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Algorithms and Data Compression
- Keywords
- scaffolding, contig ordering, paired-end reads, de novo assembly, prokaryotic genomes, eukaryotic genomes
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Software, Gene Library, Genome, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Contig Mapping, Genomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review