Cited by 11Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenomics and Rare Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

eResponseNet: a package prioritizing candidate disease genes through cellular pathways

Abstract

Motivation: Although genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have found many common genetic variants associated with human diseases, it remains a challenge to elucidate the functional links between associated variants and complex traits. Results: We developed a package called eResponseNet by implementing and extending the existing ResponseNet algorithm for prioritizing candidate disease genes through cellular pathways. Using type II diabetes (T2D) as a study case, we demonstrate that eResponseNet outperforms currently available approaches in prioritizing candidate disease genes. More importantly, the package is instrumental in revealing cellular pathways underlying disease-associated genetic variations. Availability: The eResponseNet package is freely downloadable at http://hanlab.genetics.ac.cn/eResponseNet. Contact: jdhan@picb.ac.cn Supplementary Information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr380

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Becker, 2004, The genetic association database, Nat. Genet., 36, 431, 10.1038/ng0504-431 · DOI
  2. Doss, 2005, Cis-acting expression quantitative trait loci in mice, Genome Res., 15, 681, 10.1101/gr.3216905 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Kohler, 2008, Walking the interactome for prioritization of candidate disease genes, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 82, 949, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.02.013 · DOI
  4. Lage, 2007, A human phenome-interactome network of protein complexes implicated in genetic disorders, Nat Biotechnol, 25, 309, 10.1038/nbt1295 · DOI
  5. Wu, 2008, Network-based global inference of human disease genes, Mol Syst Biol, 4, 189, 10.1038/msb.2008.27 · DOI
  6. Yeger-Lotem, 2009, Bridging high-throughput genetic and transcriptional data reveals cellular responses to alpha-synuclein toxicity, Nat Genet, 41, 316, 10.1038/ng.337 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Huang, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, W., Yu, H., & Han, J.-D. J.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2011-06-23
Volume
27
Issue
16
Pages
2319-2320
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2101017957
Cited by
11
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
candidate gene prioritization, cellular pathways, type 2 diabetes, genetic variants, complex traits, R package
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Disease, Genes, Humans, Software, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review