The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Robust rank aggregation for gene list integration and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: The continued progress in developing technological platforms, availability of many published experimental datasets, as well as different statistical methods to analyze those data have allowed approaching the same research question using various methods simultaneously. To get the best out of all these alternatives, we need to integrate their results in an unbiased manner. Prioritized gene lists are a common result presentation method in genomic data analysis applications. Thus, the rank aggregation methods can become a useful and general solution for the integration task. Results: Standard rank aggregation methods are often ill-suited for biological settings where the gene lists are inherently noisy. As a remedy, we propose a novel robust rank aggregation (RRA) method. Our method detects genes that are ranked consistently better than expected under null hypothesis of uncorrelated inputs and assigns a significance score for each gene. The underlying probabilistic model makes the algorithm parameter free and robust to outliers, noise and errors. Significance scores also provide a rigorous way to keep only the statistically relevant genes in the final list. These properties make our approach robust and compelling for many settings. Availability: All the methods are implemented as a GNU R package RobustRankAggreg, freely available at the Comprehensive R Archive Network http://cran.r-project.org/. Contact: vilo@ut.ee Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Li, W., Xu, H., Xiao, T., Cong, L., Love, M. I., Zhang, F., Irizarry, R. A., Liu, J. S., Brown, M., & Liu, X. S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0554-4 · Cited by 2,684
decoupleR: ensemble of computational methods to infer biological activities from omics data
(2022) · doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbac016 · Cited by 1,098
Visualization and analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data by kernel-based similarity learning
Wang, B., Zhu, J., Pierson, E., Ramazzotti, D., & Batzoglou, S. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4207 · Cited by 706
Dimitrov, D., Türei, D., Garrido-Rodriguez, M., Burmedi, P. L., Nagai, J. S., Boys, C., Ramirez Flores, R. O., Kim, H., Szalai, B., Costa, I. G., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30755-0 · Cited by 664
Identification of Required Host Factors for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Human Cells
Daniloski, Z., Jordan, T. X., Wessels, H.-H., Hoagland, D. A., Kasela, S., Legut, M., Maniatis, S., Mimitou, E. P., Lu, L., Geller, E., et al. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.030 · Cited by 573
Metadata
- Authors
- Kolde, R., Laur, S., Adler, P., & Vilo, J.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-01-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 573-580
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2146511318
- Cited by
- 1,191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robust rank aggregation for gene list integration and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr709
- The paper
- Kolde, R., Laur, S., Adler, P., & Vilo, J. (2012). Robust rank aggregation for gene list integration and meta-analysis. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr709
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.