Systematic tracking of dysregulated modules identifies novel genes in cancer
Abstract
Motivation: Deciphering the modus operandi of dysregulated cellular mechanisms in cancer is critical to implicate novel cancer genes and develop effective anti-cancer therapies. Fundamental to this is meticulous tracking of the behavior of core modules, including complexes and pathways across specific conditions in cancer. Results: Here, we performed a straightforward yet systematic identification and comparison of modules across pancreatic normal and cancer tissue conditions by integrating PPI, gene-expression and mutation data. Our analysis revealed interesting change-patterns in gene composition and expression correlation particularly affecting modules responsible for genome stability. Although in most cases these changes indicated impairment of essential functions (e.g. of DNA damage repair), in several other cases we noticed strengthening of modules possibly abetting cancer. Some of these compensatory modules showed switches in transcription regulation and recruitment of tumor inducers (e.g. SOX2 through overexpression). In-depth analysis revealed novel genes in pancreatic cancer, which showed susceptibility to copy-number alterations (e.g. for USP15 in 17 of 67 cases), supported by literature evidence for their involvement in other tumors (e.g. USP15 in glioblastoma). Two of the identified genes, YWHAE and DISC1, further supported the nexus between neural genes and pancreatic carcinogenesis. Extension of this assessment to BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast tumors showed specific differences even across the two sub-types and revealed novel genes involved therein (e.g. TRIM5 and NCOA6). Availability: Our software CONTOURv1 is available at: http://bioinformatics.org.au/tools-data/. Contact: m.ragan@uq.edu.au Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Usp15 global knockout mice display growth retardation and average weights 20% less compared with wild-type littermates.
“Usp15 global knock-out mice display growth retardation, and the average weights are 20% less compared with wild-type littermates52.”
From Proteostatic reactivation of the developmental transcription factor TBX3 drives BRAF/MAPK-mediated tumorigenesis (2024) · cites this paper as [52]
USP15 shows dual effects in tumorigenesis; USP15 copy number is increased in glioblastoma, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer, but decreased in pancreatic cancer.
“Due to the conflicting functions of substrates, USP15 shows dual effects in tumorigenesis. For instance, USP15 copy number is increased in glioblastoma, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer, but decreased in pancreatic cancer40,52,55–58.”
From Proteostatic reactivation of the developmental transcription factor TBX3 drives BRAF/MAPK-mediated tumorigenesis (2024) · cites this paper as [52]
Cites
Pancreatic cancer genomes reveal aberrations in axon guidance pathway genes
Initiative, A. P. C. G., Biankin, A. V., Waddell, N., Kassahn, K. S., Gingras, M.-C., Muthuswamy, L. B., Johns, A. L., Miller, D. K., Wilson, P. J., Patch, A.-M., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11547 · Cited by 2,058 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yang, Z., & Michailidis, G. (2016) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv544 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Zhang, Z., Wu, Y., Fu, J., Yu, X., Su, Y., Jia, S., Cheng, H., Shen, Y., He, X., Ren, K., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48173-9 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Srihari, S., & Ragan, M. A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Ragan, Mark A.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-05-14
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1553-1561
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2100867677
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 3.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Keywords
- protein-protein interaction network, gene expression, somatic mutations, pancreatic cancer, genome stability, DNA repair, SOX2, USP15, YWHAE, DISC1, copy number alterations, transcriptional regulation, contours
- MeSH terms
- Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Mutation, Neoplasms, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Gene Expression, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Genes, BRCA1, Genes, BRCA2, BRCA2 Protein, Protein Interaction Mapping, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Genes, Neoplasm
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review