Cited by 77Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research

Systematic tracking of dysregulated modules identifies novel genes in cancer

Srihari, Sriganesh, Ragan, Mark A.·2013·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: Deciphering the modus operandi of dysregulated cellular mechanisms in cancer is critical to implicate novel cancer genes and develop effective anti-cancer therapies. Fundamental to this is meticulous tracking of the behavior of core modules, including complexes and pathways across specific conditions in cancer. Results: Here, we performed a straightforward yet systematic identification and comparison of modules across pancreatic normal and cancer tissue conditions by integrating PPI, gene-expression and mutation data. Our analysis revealed interesting change-patterns in gene composition and expression correlation particularly affecting modules responsible for genome stability. Although in most cases these changes indicated impairment of essential functions (e.g. of DNA damage repair), in several other cases we noticed strengthening of modules possibly abetting cancer. Some of these compensatory modules showed switches in transcription regulation and recruitment of tumor inducers (e.g. SOX2 through overexpression). In-depth analysis revealed novel genes in pancreatic cancer, which showed susceptibility to copy-number alterations (e.g. for USP15 in 17 of 67 cases), supported by literature evidence for their involvement in other tumors (e.g. USP15 in glioblastoma). Two of the identified genes, YWHAE and DISC1, further supported the nexus between neural genes and pancreatic carcinogenesis. Extension of this assessment to BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast tumors showed specific differences even across the two sub-types and revealed novel genes involved therein (e.g. TRIM5 and NCOA6). Availability: Our software CONTOURv1 is available at: http://bioinformatics.org.au/tools-data/. Contact: m.ragan@uq.edu.au Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt191

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Srihari, S., & Ragan, M. A.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Ragan, Mark A.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2013-05-14
Volume
29
Issue
12
Pages
1553-1561
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2100867677
Cited by
77
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Keywords
protein-protein interaction network, gene expression, somatic mutations, pancreatic cancer, genome stability, DNA repair, SOX2, USP15, YWHAE, DISC1, copy number alterations, transcriptional regulation, contours
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Mutation, Neoplasms, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Gene Expression, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Genes, BRCA1, Genes, BRCA2, BRCA2 Protein, Protein Interaction Mapping, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Genes, Neoplasm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review