Gene Sets Net Correlations Analysis (GSNCA): a multivariate differential coexpression test for gene sets
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: To date, gene set analysis approaches primarily focus on identifying differentially expressed gene sets (pathways). Methods for identifying differentially coexpressed pathways also exist but are mostly based on aggregated pairwise correlations or other pairwise measures of coexpression. Instead, we propose Gene Sets Net Correlations Analysis (GSNCA), a multivariate differential coexpression test that accounts for the complete correlation structure between genes. Results: In GSNCA, weight factors are assigned to genes in proportion to the genes’ cross-correlations (intergene correlations). The problem of finding the weight vectors is formulated as an eigenvector problem with a unique solution. GSNCA tests the null hypothesis that for a gene set there is no difference in the weight vectors of the genes between two conditions. In simulation studies and the analyses of experimental data, we demonstrate that GSNCA captures changes in the structure of genes’ cross-correlations rather than differences in the averaged pairwise correlations. Thus, GSNCA infers differences in coexpression networks, however, bypassing method-dependent steps of network inference. As an additional result from GSNCA, we define hub genes as genes with the largest weights and show that these genes correspond frequently to major and specific pathway regulators, as well as to genes that are most affected by the biological difference between two conditions. In summary, GSNCA is a new approach for the analysis of differentially coexpressed pathways that also evaluates the importance of the genes in the pathways, thus providing unique information that may result in the generation of novel biological hypotheses. Availability and implementation: Implementation of the GSNCA test in R is available upon request from the authors. Contact: YRahmatallah@uams.edu Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GSNCA can be used to identify differentially co-expressed gene sets, which have to be defined a priori, between two sample groups.
“GSNCA [103] can be used to identify differentially co-expressed gene sets, which have to be defined a priori, between two sample groups.”
From Gene co-expression analysis for functional classification and gene–disease predictions (2017) · cites this paper as [103]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 110
- Authors
- Rahmatallah, Y., Emmert-Streib, F., & Glazko, G.
- Affiliations
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- 1 Division of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA and 2Computational Biology and Machine Learning Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK
- Corresponding author
- Rahmatallah, Yasir
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-11-30
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 360-368
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- PMC
- PMC4023302
- OpenAlex
- W2138485499
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- University of Arkansas
- Arkansas Biosciences Institute (UL1TR000039)
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UL1TR000039)
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000039)
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/H048871/1)
- National Center for Research Resources (P20RR016460)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Keywords
- gene set analysis, co-expression network, gene sets, eigenvector problem, hub genes, multivariate hypothesis testing, gene expression data
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Multivariate Analysis, Genes, p53, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Cell Line, Tumor, Gene Regulatory Networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review