The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
iEnhancer-2L: a two-layer predictor for identifying enhancers and their strength by pseudo k-tuple nucleotide composition
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Enhancers are of short regulatory DNA elements. They can be bound with proteins (activators) to activate transcription of a gene, and hence play a critical role in promoting gene transcription in eukaryotes. With the avalanche of DNA sequences generated in the post-genomic age, it is a challenging task to develop computational methods for timely identifying enhancers from extremely complicated DNA sequences. Although some efforts have been made in this regard, they were limited at only identifying whether a query DNA element being of an enhancer or not. According to the distinct levels of biological activities and regulatory effects on target genes, however, enhancers should be further classified into strong and weak ones in strength. Results: In view of this, a two-layer predictor called ‘iEnhancer-2L’ was proposed by formulating DNA elements with the ‘pseudo k-tuple nucleotide composition’, into which the six DNA local parameters were incorporated. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first computational predictor ever established for identifying not only enhancers, but also their strength. Rigorous cross-validation tests have indicated that iEnhancer-2L holds very high potential to become a useful tool for genome analysis. Availability and implementation: For the convenience of most experimental scientists, a web server for the two-layer predictor was established at http://bioinformatics.hitsz.edu.cn/iEnhancer-2L/, by which users can easily get their desired results without the need to go through the mathematical details. Contact: bliu@gordonlifescience.org, bliu@insun.hit.edu.cn, xlan@stanford.edu, kcchou@gordonlifescience.org Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods
Cristianini, N., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511801389 · Cited by 13,855
Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences
Li, W., & Godzik, A. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 · Cited by 11,410
Heintzman, N. D., Stuart, R. K., Hon, G., Fu, Y., Ching, C. W., Hawkins, R. D., Barrera, L. O., Van Calcar, S., Qu, C., Ching, K. A., et al. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1966 · Cited by 3,398
Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types
Ernst, J., Kheradpour, P., Mikkelsen, T. S., Shoresh, N., Ward, L. D., Epstein, C. B., Zhang, X., Wang, L., Issner, R., Coyne, M., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09906 · Cited by 2,898
ChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization
Ernst, J., & Kellis, M. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1906 · Cited by 2,475
Prediction of protein cellular attributes using pseudo‐amino acid composition
Chou, K. (2001) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.1035 · Cited by 1,943
Self-citationChIP-seq accurately predicts tissue-specific activity of enhancers
Visel, A., Blow, M. J., Li, Z., Zhang, T., Akiyama, J. A., Holt, A., Plajzer-Frick, I., Shoukry, M., Wright, C., Chen, F., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07730 · Cited by 1,639
Transcriptional enhancers: from properties to genome-wide predictions
Shlyueva, D., Stampfel, G., & Stark, A. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3682 · Cited by 1,356
Cited by
Chen, Z., Zhao, P., Li, F., Marquez-Lago, T. T., Leier, A., Revote, J., Zhu, Y., Powell, D. R., Akutsu, T., Webb, G. I., et al. (2020) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbz041 · Cited by 417
Self-citationLiu, B., Gao, X., & Zhang, H. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz740 · Cited by 409
Self-citationLiu, B., Yang, F., Huang, D.-S., & Chou, K.-C. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx579 · Cited by 331
Self-citationJia, J., Liu, Z., Xiao, X., Liu, B., & Chou, K.-C. (2016) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.01.020 · Cited by 323
Self-citationLiu, B. (2019) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbx165 · Cited by 322
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, B., Fang, L., Long, R., Lan, X., & Chou, K.-C.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-10-17
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 362-369
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W1807324513
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 78
- FWCI
- 22.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: iEnhancer-2L: a two-layer predictor for identifying enhancers and their strength by pseudo k-tuple nucleotide composition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv604
- The paper
- Liu, B., Fang, L., Long, R., Lan, X., & Chou, K.-C. (2016). iEnhancer-2L: a two-layer predictor for identifying enhancers and their strength by pseudo k-tuple nucleotide composition. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv604
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.