The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
iATC-mISF: a multi-label classifier for predicting the classes of anatomical therapeutic chemicals
Abstract
Motivation: Given a compound, can we predict which anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) class/classes it belongs to? It is a challenging problem since the information thus obtained can be used to deduce its possible active ingredients, as well as its therapeutic, pharmacological and chemical properties. And hence the pace of drug development could be substantially expedited. But this problem is by no means an easy one. Particularly, some drugs or compounds may belong to two or more ATC classes. Results: To address it, a multi-label classifier, called iATC-mISF, was developed by incorporating the information of chemical–chemical interaction, the information of the structural similarity, and the information of the fingerprintal similarity. Rigorous cross-validations showed that the proposed predictor achieved remarkably higher prediction quality than its cohorts for the same purpose, particularly in the absolute true rate, the most important and harsh metrics for the multi-label systems. Availability and Implementation: The web-server for iATC-mISF is accessible at http://www.jci-bioinfo.cn/iATC-mISF. Furthermore, to maximize the convenience for most experimental scientists, a step-by-step guide was provided, by which users can easily get their desired results without needing to go through the complicated mathematical equations. Their inclusion in this article is just for the integrity of the new method and stimulating more powerful methods to deal with various multi-label systems in biology. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Some remarks on protein attribute prediction and pseudo amino acid composition
Chou, K.-C. (2011) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.12.024 · Cited by 1,225
Self-citation
Cited by
Meher, P. K., Sahu, T. K., Saini, V., & Rao, A. R. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep42362 · Cited by 516
Liu, B., Yang, F., Huang, D.-S., & Chou, K.-C. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx579 · Cited by 331
Self-citationSu, Z.-D., Huang, Y., Zhang, Z.-Y., Zhao, Y.-W., Wang, D., Chen, W., Chou, K.-C., & Lin, H. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty508 · Cited by 294
Self-citationFeng, P., Ding, H., Yang, H., Chen, W., Lin, H., & Chou, K.-C. (2017) · Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2017.03.006 · Cited by 288
Self-citationBehavioral Modeling for Mental Health using Machine Learning Algorithms
Srividya, M., Mohanavalli, S., & Bhalaji, N. (2018) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-018-0934-5 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, X., Zhao, S.-G., Xiao, X., & Chou, K.-C.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-10-14
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 341-346
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2530181556
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 50.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: iATC-mISF: a multi-label classifier for predicting the classes of anatomical therapeutic chemicals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw644
- The paper
- Cheng, X., Zhao, S.-G., Xiao, X., & Chou, K.-C. (2017). iATC-mISF: a multi-label classifier for predicting the classes of anatomical therapeutic chemicals. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw644
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.