Cited by 93Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Very low-depth whole-genome sequencing in complex trait association studies

Open access
Gilly, Arthur, Southam, Lorraine, Suveges, Daniel, Kuchenbaecker, Karoline, Moore, Rachel, Melloni, Giorgio E M, Hatzikotoulas, Konstantinos, Farmaki, Aliki-Eleni +9 more·2019·Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: Very low-depth sequencing has been proposed as a cost-effective approach to capture low-frequency and rare variation in complex trait association studies. However, a full characterization of the genotype quality and association power for very low-depth sequencing designs is still lacking. Results: We perform cohort-wide whole-genome sequencing (WGS) at low depth in 1239 individuals (990 at 1× depth and 249 at 4× depth) from an isolated population, and establish a robust pipeline for calling and imputing very low-depth WGS genotypes from standard bioinformatics tools. Using genotyping chip, whole-exome sequencing (75× depth) and high-depth (22×) WGS data in the same samples, we examine in detail the sensitivity of this approach, and show that imputed 1× WGS recapitulates 95.2% of variants found by imputed GWAS with an average minor allele concordance of 97% for common and low-frequency variants. In our study, 1× further allowed the discovery of 140 844 true low-frequency variants with 73% genotype concordance when compared to high-depth WGS data. Finally, using association results for 57 quantitative traits, we show that very low-depth WGS is an efficient alternative to imputed GWAS chip designs, allowing the discovery of up to twice as many true association signals than the classical imputed GWAS design. Availability and implementation: The HELIC genotype and WGS datasets have been deposited to the European Genome-phenome Archive (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ega/home): EGAD00010000518; EGAD00010000522; EGAD00010000610; EGAD00001001636, EGAD00001001637. The peakplotter software is available at https://github.com/wtsi-team144/peakplotter, the transformPhenotype app can be downloaded at https://github.com/wtsi-team144/transformPhenotype. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty1032

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lack of supporting resources for diverse ancestries creates financial challenges for association studies with limited resources.

    “The lack of supporting resources for diverse ancestries creates financial challenges for association studies with limited resources, e.g. raising questions about whether to genotype samples on GWAS arrays that may favor European allele frequencies versus sequence samples, and how dense of an array to choose or how deeply to sequence71,72.”

    From Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities (2019) · cites this paper as [71]

    The Introduction (page not available in our copy) says high-depth sequencing is costly and presents low-depth sequencing as a cost-efficient alternative to imputed GWAS arrays. It does not attribute those costs to a lack of resources for diverse ancestries, discuss European-favoring array design, or specifically address studies with limited resources. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium et al (2015) A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature, 526, 68– 74. 26432245 PMC4750478
  2. Alex Buerkle C., Gompert Z. (2013) Population genomics based on low coverage sequencing: how low should we go? Mol. Ecol., 22, 3028– 3035. 23174005
  3. Arthur R. et al (2017) AKT: ancestry and kinship toolkit. Bioinformatics, 33, 142– 144. 27634946
  4. Astle W.J. et al (2016) The allelic landscape of human blood cell trait variation and links to common complex disease. Cell, 167, 1415– 1429. 27863252 PMC5300907
  5. Brody J.A. et al (2017) Analysis commons, a team approach to discovery in a big-data environment for genetic epidemiology. Nat. Genet., 49, 1560– 1563. 29074945 PMC5720686
  6. Browning B.L., Browning S.R. (2016) Genotype Imputation with Millions of Reference Samples. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 98, 116– 126. 26748515 PMC4716681
  7. Browning S.R., Browning B.L. (2007) Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 81, 1084– 1097. 17924348 PMC2265661
  8. Bycroft C. et al (2017) Genome-wide genetic data on ∼500, 000 UK Biobank participants. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=30305743.
  9. Converge Consortium. (2015) Sparse whole-genome sequencing identifies two loci for major depressive disorder. Nature, 523, 588– 591. 26176920 PMC4522619
  10. Davies R.W. et al (2016) Rapid genotype imputation from sequence without reference panels. Nat. Genet., 48, 965– 969. 27376236 PMC4966640
  11. Delaneau O. et al (2013) Haplotype estimation using sequencing reads. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 93, 687– 696. 24094745 PMC3791270
  12. Eberle M.A. et al (2017) A reference data set of 5.4 million phased human variants validated by genetic inheritance from sequencing a three-generation 17-member pedigree. Genome Res., 27, 157– 164. 27903644 PMC5204340
  13. Gilly A. et al (2016) Very low-depth sequencing in a founder population identifies a cardioprotective APOC3 signal missed by genome-wide imputation. Hum. Mol. Genet., 25, 2360– 2365. 27146844 PMC5081052
  14. Gilly A. et al (2018) Cohort-wide deep whole genome sequencing and the allelic architecture of complex traits. Nat. Commun., 9, 4674. 30405126 PMC6220258
  15. Golding J. et al (2001) ALSPAC–the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. I. Study methodology. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol., 15, 74– 87. 11237119
  16. Herzig A.F. et al (2018) Strategies for phasing and imputation in a population isolate. Genet. Epidemiol., 42, 201– 213. 29319195
  17. Howie B. et al (2011) Genotype imputation with thousands of genomes. G3 (Bethesda), 1, 457– 470. 22384356 PMC3276165
  18. Le S.Q., Durbin R. (2011) SNP detection and genotyping from low-coverage sequencing data on multiple diploid samples. Genome Res., 21, 952– 960. 20980557 PMC3106328
  19. Li H. et al (2009) The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics, 25, 2078– 2079. 19505943 PMC2723002
  20. Livne O.E. et al (2015) PRIMAL: fast and accurate pedigree-based imputation from sequence data in a founder population. PLoS Comput. Biol., 11, e1004139. 25735005 PMC4348507
  21. McCarthy S. et al (2016) A reference panel of 64, 976 haplotypes for genotype imputation. Nat. Genet., 48, 1279– 1283. 27548312 PMC5388176
  22. McKenna A. et al (2010) The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res., 20, 1297– 1303. 20644199 PMC2928508
  23. Moayyeri A. et al (2013) The UK Adult Twin Registry (TwinsUK Resource). Twin Res. Hum. Genet., 16, 144– 149. 23088889 PMC3927054
  24. Pasaniuc B. et al (2012) Extremely low-coverage sequencing and imputation increases power for genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet., 44, 631– 635. 22610117 PMC3400344
  25. Southam L. et al (2017) Whole genome sequencing and imputation in isolated populations identify genetic associations with medically-relevant complex traits. Nat. Commun., 8, 15606. 28548082 PMC5458552
  26. Tachmazidou I. et al (2017) Whole-genome sequencing coupled to imputation discovers genetic signals for anthropometric traits. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 100, 865– 884. 28552196 PMC5473732
  27. UK10K Consortium. et al (2015) The UK10K project identifies rare variants in health and disease. Nature, 526, 82– 90. 26367797 PMC4773891

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gilly, A., Southam, L., Suveges, D., Kuchenbaecker, K., Moore, R., Melloni, G. E. M., Hatzikotoulas, K., Farmaki, A.-E., Ritchie, G., Schwartzentruber, J., Danecek, P., Kilian, B., Pollard, M. O., Ge, X., Tsafantakis, E., Dedoussis, G., & Zeggini, E.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
  • Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
  • Department of Human Genetics, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Harokopio University of Athens (GR)
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
  • Anogia Medical Centre, Anogia, Greece
Corresponding author
Zeggini, Eleftheria
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2018-12-21
Volume
35
Issue
15
Pages
2555-2561
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2949838375
Cited by
93
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4
FWCI
5.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (098051, WT091310)
  • European Research Council (ERC-2011-StG 280559-SEPI)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords
low-frequency variants, genotype imputation, genotype calling, quantitative traits, genotype concordance, isolated populations
MeSH terms
Whole Genome Sequencing, Genotype, Humans, Multifactorial Inheritance, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review