Cited by 117Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

CONICS integrates scRNA-seq with DNA sequencing to map gene expression to tumor sub-clones

Open access
Müller, Sören, Cho, Ara, Liu, Siyuan J, Lim, Daniel A, Diaz, Aaron·2018·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) has enabled studies of tissue composition at unprecedented resolution. However, the application of scRNA-seq to clinical cancer samples has been limited, partly due to a lack of scRNA-seq algorithms that integrate genomic mutation data. Results: To address this, we present CONICS: COpy-Number analysis In single-Cell RNA-Sequencing. CONICS is a software tool for mapping gene expression from scRNA-seq to tumor clones and phylogenies, with routines enabling: the quantitation of copy-number alterations in scRNA-seq, robust separation of neoplastic cells from tumor-infiltrating stroma, inter-clone differential-expression analysis and intra-clone co-expression analysis. Availability and implementation: CONICS is written in Python and R, and is available from https://github.com/diazlab/CONICS. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty316

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Integration of lpWGS CNV profiles with single-cell RNA-seq enables researchers to correlate structural variants with gene-expression changes in cell-line sub-clones, organoids or primary tissue samples.

    “This enables researchers to correlate structural variants with gene-expression changes in cell-line sub-clones, organoids or primary tissue samples [52,53].”

    From Genetic Insights into the Economic Toll of Cell Line Misidentification: A Comprehensive Review (2026) · cites this paper as [52]

    Section 2.1 reports combining scRNA-seq with exome sequencing from a glioblastoma biopsy and examining correlations between CNV status and gene expression. Section 2.3 describes comparing expression networks between inferred tumor clones. Our copy does not establish the claim specifically for lpWGS CNV profiles, cell-line sub-clones, or organoids. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Tools like CONICSmat first infer large-scale copy-number states from the expression matrix and then overlay these states onto the corresponding UMAP/t-SNE plots.

    “For example, tools like CONICSmat first infer large-scale copy-number states from the expression matrix and then overlay these states onto the corresponding UMAP/t-SNE plots.”

    From Genetic Insights into the Economic Toll of Cell Line Misidentification: A Comprehensive Review (2026) · cites this paper as [52]

    Section 1 (Introduction) says CONICS identifies large-scale copy-number variants in scRNA-seq, and Section 2.1 identifies CONICSmat as a related package that can be used without DNA-sequencing data. Our copy does not say that CONICSmat overlays inferred states on UMAP or t-SNE plots, so that part of the attributed workflow is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Müller, S., Cho, A., Liu, S. J., Lim, D. A., & Diaz, A.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Diaz, Aaron
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2018-04-20
Volume
34
Issue
18
Pages
3217-3219
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2802963454
Cited by
117
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer League Research
  • NCI Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (P30-CA82103-18)
  • UCSF Brain Tumor SPORE Career Development Award (P50-CA097257-13: 7017)
  • Dabbiere Family
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
single-cell RNA sequencing, tumor subclones, tumor phylogeny, copy number alterations, gene expression mapping, cancer genomics
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Humans, Neoplasms, Software, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Sequence Analysis, RNA, RNA, Small Cytoplasmic, Gene Expression Profiling, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review