Enhancing the prediction of disease-gene associations with multimodal deep learning
Abstract
Motivation: Computationally predicting disease genes helps scientists optimize the in-depth experimental validation and accelerates the identification of real disease-associated genes. Modern high-throughput technologies have generated a vast amount of omics data, and integrating them is expected to improve the accuracy of computational prediction. As an integrative model, multimodal deep belief net (DBN) can capture cross-modality features from heterogeneous datasets to model a complex system. Studies have shown its power in image classification and tumor subtype prediction. However, multimodal DBN has not been used in predicting disease–gene associations. Results: In this study, we propose a method to predict disease–gene associations by multimodal DBN (dgMDL). Specifically, latent representations of protein-protein interaction networks and gene ontology terms are first learned by two DBNs independently. Then, a joint DBN is used to learn cross-modality representations from the two sub-models by taking the concatenation of their obtained latent representations as the multimodal input. Finally, disease–gene associations are predicted with the learned cross-modality representations. The proposed method is compared with two state-of-the-art algorithms in terms of 5-fold cross-validation on a set of curated disease–gene associations. dgMDL achieves an AUC of 0.969 which is superior to the competing algorithms. Further analysis of the top-10 unknown disease–gene pairs also demonstrates the ability of dgMDL in predicting new disease–gene associations. Availability and implementation: Prediction results and a reference implementation of dgMDL in Python is available on https://github.com/luoping1004/dgMDL. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DBNs have been extensively used to fuse biomedical modalities for drug repurposing, clustering of cancer patients, and predicting disease-gene pairs.
“DBNs have been extensively used to fuse biomedical modalities for drug repurposing [52], clustering of cancer patients [53] and predicting disease-gene pairs [54].”
From Multimodal deep learning for biomedical data fusion: a review (2022) · cites this paper as [54]
Cites
Training Products of Experts by Minimizing Contrastive Divergence
Hinton, G. E. (2002) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976602760128018 · Cited by 4,879 · see citing works
Comprehensive genomic characterization of squamous cell lung cancers
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11404 · Cited by 3,994 · see citing works
PTPN11 is a central node in intrinsic and acquired resistance to targeted cancer drugs
Prahallad, A., Heynen, G. J. J. E., Germano, G., Willems, S. M., Evers, B., Vecchione, L., Gambino, V., Lieftink, C., Beijersbergen, R. L., Di Nicolantonio, F., et al. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.037 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multimodal deep learning for biomedical data fusion: a review
Stahlschmidt, S. R., Ulfenborg, B., & Synnergren, J. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbab569 · Cited by 766 · see citing works
- Authors
- Luo, P., Li, Y., Tian, L.-P., & Wu, F.-X.
- Affiliations
- University of Saskatchewan (CA)
- Beijing Wuzi University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wu, Fang-Xiang
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-03-02
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 3735-3742
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2918710707
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 3.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- NSERC
- China Scholarship Council (CSC)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61772552, 61571052)
- Science Foundation of Wuhan Institute of Technology (K201746)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- gene-disease association prediction, protein-protein interaction network, Gene Ontology, latent representations, multi-omics integration, disease gene identification
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Algorithms, Computational Biology, Protein Interaction Maps, Gene Ontology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review