Cited by 80Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesGenetic diversity and population structure

ASTRAL-MP: scaling ASTRAL to very large datasets using randomization and parallelization

Open access
Yin, John, Zhang, Chao, Mirarab, Siavash·2019·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: Evolutionary histories can change from one part of the genome to another. The potential for discordance between the gene trees has motivated the development of summary methods that reconstruct a species tree from an input collection of gene trees. ASTRAL is a widely used summary method and has been able to scale to relatively large datasets. However, the size of genomic datasets is quickly growing. Despite its relative efficiency, the current single-threaded implementation of ASTRAL is falling behind the data growth trends is not able to analyze the largest available datasets in a reasonable time. Results: ASTRAL uses dynamic programing and is not trivially parallel. In this paper, we introduce ASTRAL-MP, the first version of ASTRAL that can exploit parallelism and also uses randomization techniques to speed up some of its steps. Importantly, ASTRAL-MP can take advantage of not just multiple CPU cores but also one or several graphics processing units (GPUs). The ASTRAL-MP code scales very well with increasing CPU cores, and its GPU version, implemented in OpenCL, can have up to 158× speedups compared to ASTRAL-III. Using GPUs and multiple cores, ASTRAL-MP is able to analyze datasets with 10 000 species or datasets with more than 100 000 genes in <2 days. Availability and implementation: ASTRAL-MP is available at https://github.com/smirarab/ASTRAL/tree/MP. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz211

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mossel,E. and Roch,S. (2010) Incomplete lineage sorting: consistent phyl- ogeny estimation from multiple loci. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform., 7, 166-171.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yin, J., Zhang, C., & Mirarab, S.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Mirarab, Siavash
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2019-03-23
Volume
35
Issue
20
Pages
3961-3969
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2943825966
Cited by
80
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1565862, ACI-1053575)
  • Frontiers of Innovation Scholars Program
  • University of California
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
species tree estimation, gene tree discordance, parallel computing, GPU acceleration, OpenCL, randomization, scalability, large-scale genomic data, multi-core computing
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Computers, Random Allocation, Software, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review