ASTRAL-MP: scaling ASTRAL to very large datasets using randomization and parallelization
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Evolutionary histories can change from one part of the genome to another. The potential for discordance between the gene trees has motivated the development of summary methods that reconstruct a species tree from an input collection of gene trees. ASTRAL is a widely used summary method and has been able to scale to relatively large datasets. However, the size of genomic datasets is quickly growing. Despite its relative efficiency, the current single-threaded implementation of ASTRAL is falling behind the data growth trends is not able to analyze the largest available datasets in a reasonable time. Results: ASTRAL uses dynamic programing and is not trivially parallel. In this paper, we introduce ASTRAL-MP, the first version of ASTRAL that can exploit parallelism and also uses randomization techniques to speed up some of its steps. Importantly, ASTRAL-MP can take advantage of not just multiple CPU cores but also one or several graphics processing units (GPUs). The ASTRAL-MP code scales very well with increasing CPU cores, and its GPU version, implemented in OpenCL, can have up to 158× speedups compared to ASTRAL-III. Using GPUs and multiple cores, ASTRAL-MP is able to analyze datasets with 10 000 species or datasets with more than 100 000 genes in <2 days. Availability and implementation: ASTRAL-MP is available at https://github.com/smirarab/ASTRAL/tree/MP. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The topology of the ASTRAL tree generated with WGTs by coalescent-based phylogenetic method was identical to the 4d-sites tree.
“The topology of the ASTRAL tree32 generated with WGTs by coalescent-based phylogenetic method (Fig. S10) was found to be identical to the 4d-sites tree (Fig. S6).”
From Genomic and genetic insights into speciation and pigment pattern diversification in <i>Danio</i> fishes (2025) · cites this paper as [32]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Phylotranscriptomic analysis of the origin and early diversification of land plants
Wickett, N. J., Mirarab, S., Nguyen, N., Warnow, T., Carpenter, E., Matasci, N., Ayyampalayam, S., Barker, M. S., Burleigh, J. G., Gitzendanner, M. A., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1323926111 · Cited by 1,252 · see citing works
Self-citationStatistical binning enables an accurate coalescent-based estimation of the avian tree
Mirarab, S., Bayzid, M. S., Boussau, B., & Warnow, T. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1250463 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Self-citationGenome-wide interrogation advances resolution of recalcitrant groups in the tree of life
Arcila, D., Ortí, G., Vari, R., Armbruster, J. W., Stiassny, M. L. J., Ko, K. D., Sabaj, M. H., Lundberg, J., Revell, L. J., & Betancur-R., R. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-016-0020 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
New deep-sea species of Xenoturbella and the position of Xenacoelomorpha
Rouse, G. W., Wilson, N. G., Carvajal, J. I., & Vrijenhoek, R. C. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16545 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Mossel,E. and Roch,S. (2010) Incomplete lineage sorting: consistent phyl- ogeny estimation from multiple loci. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform., 7, 166-171.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lu, J., Podobnik, M., Huang, J., McCluskey, B. M., McCarthy, S. A., Wood, J., Collins, J., Torrance, J., Sims, Y., Gao, D., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1101/2025.10.17.682988 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yin, J., Zhang, C., & Mirarab, S.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mirarab, Siavash
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-03-23
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 3961-3969
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2943825966
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 2.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1565862, ACI-1053575)
- Frontiers of Innovation Scholars Program
- University of California
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Keywords
- species tree estimation, gene tree discordance, parallel computing, GPU acceleration, OpenCL, randomization, scalability, large-scale genomic data, multi-core computing
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Computers, Random Allocation, Software, Genomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review