Cited by 59RNA Research and SplicingGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

DeepPASTA: deep neural network based polyadenylation site analysis

Open access
Arefeen, Ashraful, Xiao, Xinshu, Jiang, Tao·2019·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: Alternative polyadenylation (polyA) sites near the 3′ end of a pre-mRNA create multiple mRNA transcripts with different 3′ untranslated regions (3′ UTRs). The sequence elements of a 3′ UTR are essential for many biological activities such as mRNA stability, sub-cellular localization, protein translation, protein binding and translation efficiency. Moreover, numerous studies in the literature have reported the correlation between diseases and the shortening (or lengthening) of 3′ UTRs. As alternative polyA sites are common in mammalian genes, several machine learning tools have been published for predicting polyA sites from sequence data. These tools either consider limited sequence features or use relatively old algorithms for polyA site prediction. Moreover, none of the previous tools consider RNA secondary structures as a feature to predict polyA sites. Results: In this paper, we propose a new deep learning model, called DeepPASTA, for predicting polyA sites from both sequence and RNA secondary structure data. The model is then extended to predict tissue-specific polyA sites. Moreover, the tool can predict the most dominant (i.e. frequently used) polyA site of a gene in a specific tissue and relative dominance when two polyA sites of the same gene are given. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that DeepPASTA signisficantly outperforms the existing tools for polyA site prediction and tissue-specific relative and absolute dominant polyA site prediction. Availability and implementation: https://github.com/arefeen/DeepPASTA Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz283

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sequence-based models of post-transcriptional regulation rely on genome annotations and transformed measurements extracted from RNA-seq to isolate each regulatory mechanism.

    “Similarly, sequence-based models of post-transcriptional regulation rely on genome annotations and transformed measurements extracted from RNA-seq to isolate each regulatory mechanism (for example, percent spliced-in for splicing)14–23.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arefeen, A., Xiao, X., & Jiang, T.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
  • Xiao, Xinshu
  • Jiang, Tao
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2019-04-25
Volume
35
Issue
22
Pages
4577-4585
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2940943632
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NSF (IIS-1646333)
  • NIH (U01HG009417)
  • NSFC (61370172)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
alternative polyadenylation, 3' untranslated region, RNA secondary structure
MeSH terms
Animals, Poly A, RNA, Messenger, Neural Networks, Computer, 3' Untranslated Regions, Polyadenylation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review