DeepCOP: deep learning-based approach to predict gene regulating effects of small molecules
Abstract
Motivation: Recent advances in the areas of bioinformatics and chemogenomics are poised to accelerate the discovery of small molecule regulators of cell development. Combining large genomics and molecular data sources with powerful deep learning techniques has the potential to revolutionize predictive biology. In this study, we present Deep gene COmpound Profiler (DeepCOP), a deep learning based model that can predict gene regulating effects of low-molecular weight compounds. This model can be used for direct identification of a drug candidate causing a desired gene expression response, without utilizing any information on its interactions with protein target(s). Results: In this study, we successfully combined molecular fingerprint descriptors and gene descriptors (derived from gene ontology terms) to train deep neural networks that predict differential gene regulation endpoints collected in LINCS database. We achieved 10-fold cross-validation RAUC scores of and above 0.80, as well as enrichment factors of >5. We validated our models using an external RNA-Seq dataset generated in-house that described the effect of three potent antiandrogens (with different modes of action) on gene expression in LNCaP prostate cancer cell line. The results of this pilot study demonstrate that deep learning models can effectively synergize molecular and genomic descriptors and can be used to screen for novel drug candidates with the desired effect on gene expression. We anticipate that such models can find a broad use in developing novel cancer therapeutics and can facilitate precision oncology efforts. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
QSAR descriptors and GO terms can be combined within a unified QSAR model capable of predicting the effect of a given molecule on a particular gene.
“QSAR descriptors and GO terms can be combined within a unified QSAR model capable of predicting the effect of a given molecule on a particular gene.129”
From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [129]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A Next Generation Connectivity Map: L1000 Platform and the First 1,000,000 Profiles
Subramanian, A., Narayan, R., Corsello, S. M., Peck, D. D., Natoli, T. E., Lu, X., Gould, J., Davis, J. F., Tubelli, A. A., Asiedu, J. K., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.049 · Cited by 3,515 · see citing works
DeepTox: toxicity prediction using deep learning
Mayr, A., Klambauer, G., Unterthiner, T., & Hochreiter, S. (2016) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2015.00080 · Cited by 1,081 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Muratov, E. N., Bajorath, J., Sheridan, R. P., Tetko, I. V., Filimonov, D., Poroikov, V., Oprea, T. I., Baskin, I. I., Varnek, A., Roitberg, A., et al. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00098a · Cited by 913 · see citing works
Self-citationWu, Y., Liu, Q., Qiu, Y., & Xie, L. (2022) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010367 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Woo, G., Fernandez, M., Hsing, M., Lack, N. A., Cavga, A. D., & Cherkasov, A.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia V6H 3Z6, Canada
- Koç University (TR)
- Chemical and Biological Engineering, Koç University , Rumelifeneri Yolu, Istanbul 34450, Turkey
- Corresponding author
- Cherkasov, Artem
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-08-26
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 813-818
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2970852745
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (#156094, #390757)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Keywords
- chemogenomics, deep neural network, molecular fingerprints, differential gene expression, androgen receptor antagonists, precision oncology, drug candidate screening
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Pilot Projects, Precision Medicine, Gene Ontology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review