Cited by 57Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

ChIPseqSpikeInFree: a ChIP-seq normalization approach to reveal global changes in histone modifications without spike-in

Open access
Jin, Hongjian, Kasper, Lawryn H, Larson, Jon D, Wu, Gang, Baker, Suzanne J, Zhang, Jinghui, Fan, Yiping·2020·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: The traditional reads per million normalization method is inappropriate for the evaluation of ChIP-seq data when treatments or mutations have global effects. Changes in global levels of histone modifications can be detected with exogenous reference spike-in controls. However, most ChIP-seq studies overlook the normalization that must be corrected with spike-in. A method that retrospectively renormalizes datasets without spike-in is lacking. Results: ChIPseqSpikeInFree is a novel ChIP-seq normalization method to effectively determine scaling factors for samples across various conditions and treatments, which does not rely on exogenous spike-in chromatin or peak detection to reveal global changes in histone modification occupancy. Application of ChIPseqSpikeInFree on five datasets demonstrates that this in silico approach reveals a similar magnitude of global changes as the spike-in method does. Availability and implementation: St. Jude Cloud (https://pecan.stjude.cloud/permalink/spikefree) and St. Jude Github ( https://github.com/stjude/ChIPseqSpikeInFree). Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz720

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 22 · Cited by 57

Authors
Jin, H., Kasper, L. H., Larson, J. D., Wu, G., Baker, S. J., Zhang, J., & Fan, Y.
Affiliations
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Fan, Yiping
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2019-09-30
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
1270-1272
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2979008768
Cited by
57
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA021765)
  • National Institutes of Health (P01CA096832)
  • American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities
  • NIH
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
spike-in controls, histone modifications, scale factor
MeSH terms
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing, Chromatin, Retrospective Studies, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Histone Code, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review