The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A GENERALIZATION OF POISSON'S BINOMIAL LIMIT FOR USE IN ECOLOGY
Abstract
A GENERALIZATION OF POISSON'S BINOMIAL LIMIT FOR USE IN ECOLOGY MARJORIE THOMAS MARJORIE THOMAS University CollegeLondon Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Biometrika, Volume 36, Issue 1-2, June 1949, Pages 18–25, https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/36.1-2.18 Published: 01 June 1949
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reconstructing the reproductive mode of an Ediacaran macro-organism
Mitchell, E. G., Kenchington, C. G., Liu, A. G., Matthews, J. J., & Butterfield, N. J. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14646 · Cited by 109
Barnes, H., & Marshall, S. M. (1951) · Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom · doi:10.1017/s002531540001273x · Cited by 81
The utility of height for the Ediacaran organisms of Mistaken Point
Mitchell, E. G., & Kenchington, C. G. (2018) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0591-6 · Cited by 60
Knitter, D., & Nakoinz, O. (2018) · Natural Science in Archaeology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25316-9_4 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- THOMAS, M.
- Venue
- Biometrika
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1949
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 18-25
- ISSN
- 0006-3444 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3510
- OpenAlex
- W2042478118
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.