Cited by 5,739Advanced Statistical Process MonitoringProbability and Statistical ResearchStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications

CONTINUOUS INSPECTION SCHEMES

PAGE, E. S.·1954·Biometrika

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/biomet/41.1-2.100

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The anomaly scores for each feature are individually used as values for the cusum algorithm to detect disturbances.

    “The anomaly scores for each feature in the observation are then individually used as values for the cusum algorithm (Page, 1954) to detect any disturbances.”

    From Novelty Detection in Reinforcement Learning with World Models (2023) · cites this paper as Page, 1954

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PAGE, E. S.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
PAGE, E. S.
Venue
Biometrika
Published
1954
Volume
41
Issue
1-2
Pages
100-115
ISSN
  • 0006-3444 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3510
OpenAlex
W2051903196
Cited by
5,739
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 410 · 2025: 316 · 2024: 321 · 2023: 294 · 2022: 263 · 2021: 368 · 2020: 339 · 2019: 272 · 2018: 290 · 2017: 240 · 2016: 234 · 2015: 210 · 2014: 211 · 2013: 212 · 2012: 188
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biometrika (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Keywords
acceptance sampling, statistical quality control, sampling plans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review