Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 416

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

THE NUMBER OF NEW SPECIES, AND THE INCREASE IN POPULATION COVERAGE, WHEN A SAMPLE IS INCREASED

GOOD, I. J., TOULMIN, G. H.·1956·Biometrika

Abstract

A sample of size N is drawn at random from a population of animals of various species. Methods are given for estimating, knowing only the contents of this sample, the number of species which will be represented r times in a second sample of size AN; these also enable us to estimate the number of different species and the proportion of the whole population represented in the second sample. A formula is found for the variance of the estimate; when A> 2, this variance becomes in general very large, so that the estimate is useless without some modification. This difficulty can be partly overcome, at least for A < 5, by using Euler's method with a suitable parameter or the methods described by Shanks (1955) to hasten the convergence of the series by which the estimate is expressed. The methods are applied to samples of words from Our Mutual Friend, to an entomological sample, and to a sample of nouns from Macaulay's essay on Bacon. 1.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/biomet/43.1-2.45

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 416

Metadata

Authors
GOOD, I. J., & TOULMIN, G. H.
Venue
Biometrika
Published
1956
Volume
43
Issue
1-2
Pages
45-63
ISSN
  • 0006-3444 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3510
OpenAlex
W2095306947
Cited by
416
References
0
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE NUMBER OF NEW SPECIES, AND THE INCREASE IN POPULATION COVERAGE, WHEN A SAMPLE IS INCREASED. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/biomet/43.1-2.45
The paper
GOOD, I. J., & TOULMIN, G. H. (1956). THE NUMBER OF NEW SPECIES, AND THE INCREASE IN POPULATION COVERAGE, WHEN A SAMPLE IS INCREASED. Biometrika. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/43.1-2.45

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.