The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A TEST OF HOMOGENEITY FOR ORDERED ALTERNATIVES
Abstract
A TEST OF HOMOGENEITY FOR ORDERED ALTERNATIVES Get access D. J. BARTHOLOMEW D. J. BARTHOLOMEW University College of North Staffordshire Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Biometrika, Volume 46, Issue 1-2, June 1959, Pages 36–48, https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/46.1-2.36 Published: 01 June 1959
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Use of the Rank Transform in Regression
Iman, R. L., & Conover, W. J. (1979) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1979.10489820 · Cited by 514
The Isotonic Regression Problem and its Dual
Barlow, R. E., & Brunk, H. D. (1972) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1972.10481216 · Cited by 245
Tseng, Y.-H., Butte, A. J., Kokkotou, E., Yechoor, V. K., Taniguchi, C. M., Kriauciunas, K. M., Cypess, A. M., Niinobe, M., Yoshikawa, K., Patti, M. E., et al. (2005) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1259 · Cited by 222
Constrained statistical inference: sample-size tables for ANOVA and regression
Vanbrabant, L., Van De Schoot, R., & Rosseel, Y. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01565 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- BARTHOLOMEW, D. J.
- Venue
- Biometrika
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1959
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 36-48
- ISSN
- 0006-3444 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3510
- OpenAlex
- W4231926594
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
