The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An extended quasi-likelihood function
Abstract
Wedderburn's original definition of quasi-likelihood for generalized linear models is extended to allow the comparison of variance functions as well as those of linear predictors and link functions. The relationship between generalized linear models and the use of transformations of the response variable is explored, and the ideas are illustrated by three examples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quasi-likelihood functions, generalized linear models, and the Gauss—Newton method
WEDDERBURN, R. W. M. (1974) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/61.3.439 · Cited by 2,122
Cited by
voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts
Law, C. W., Chen, Y., Shi, W., & Smyth, G. K. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r29 · Cited by 6,155
Model Selection for Extended Quasi-Likelihood Models in Small Samples
Hurvich, C. M., & Tsai, C.-L. (1995) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533006 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- NELDER, J. A., & PREGIBON, D.
- Venue
- Biometrika
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1987
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 221-232
- ISSN
- 0006-3444 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3510
- OpenAlex
- W2116366840
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An extended quasi-likelihood function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/biomet/74.2.221
- The paper
- NELDER, J. A., & PREGIBON, D. (1987). An extended quasi-likelihood function. Biometrika. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/74.2.221
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
