Cited by 114Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsProbability and Statistical ResearchStatistical Methods and Inference

Weighted log rank type statistics for comparing survival curves when there is a time lag in the effectiveness of treatment

ZUCKER, DAVID M., LAKATOS, EDWARD·1990·Biometrika

Abstract

In certain long-term treatment trials, one expects some lag period before the treatment is fully effective. This paper presents two weighted log rank type statistics designed to have good efficiency over a wide range of lags: a maximin efficiency robust statistic and a simplified version of this statistic. Both statistics can be computed as easily as the log rank statistic. Asymptotic efficiency calculations, supported by small sample simulations, show that the two proposed statistics are substantially more efficient than the conventional log rank statistic in certain lag situations with comparatively little efficiency loss relative to the log rank statistic when no lag exists. We recommend the maximin statistic for situations where a lag is expected but cannot be specified precisely in advance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/biomet/77.4.853

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A stratified constant piecewise weighted log-rank test (weight 0 for weeks 0 to 8 after randomization and weight 1 after that period) was used to compare the trial groups because both groups received the same treatments during the bridging period.

    “We used a stratified constant piecewise weighted log-rank test (in which a weight of 0 was assigned for the log-rank statistic for weeks 0 to 8 after randomization and a weight of 1 after that period) 22,23 to compare the trial groups, because both groups received the same treatments during the bridging period.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ZUCKER, D. M., & LAKATOS, E.
Affiliations
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US)
Venue
Biometrika
Published
1990
Volume
77
Issue
4
Pages
853-864
ISSN
  • 0006-3444 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3510
OpenAlex
W2079219970
Cited by
114
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biometrika (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
Keywords
survival curves, asymptotic efficiency, small sample simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review