The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Covariance structure of the Gibbs sampler with applications to the comparisons of estimators and augmentation schemes
Abstract
We study the covariance structure of a Markov chain generated by the Gibbs sampler, with emphasis on data augmentation. When applied to a Bayesian missing data problem, the Gibbs sampler produces two natural approximations for the posterior distribution of the parameter vector: the empirical distribution based on the sampled values of the parameter vector, and a mixture of complete data posteriors. We prove that Rao-Blackwellization causes a one-lag delay for the autocovariances among dependent samples obtained from data augmentation, and consequently, the mixture approximation produces estimates with smaller variances than the empirical approximation. The covariance structure results are used to compare different augmentation schemes. It is shown that collapsing and grouping random components in a Gibbs sampler with two or three components usually result in more efficient sampling schemes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications.
Hastings, W. K. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · Cited by 15,195
Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities
Gelfand, A. E., & Smith, A. F. M. (1990) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213 · Cited by 6,606
Group representations in probability and statistics
Diaconis, P. (1988) · doi:10.1214/lnms/1215467407 · Cited by 1,381
Cited by
Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation
King, G., Honaker, J., Joseph, A., & Scheve, K. (2001) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055401000235 · Cited by 1,834
(1997) · Cited by 1,193
van Dyk, D. A., & Meng, X.-L. (2001) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1198/10618600152418584 · Cited by 1,052
The EM Algorithm—an Old Folk-song Sung to a Fast New Tune
Meng, X.-L., & Van Dyk, D. (1997) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00082 · Cited by 802
Penalized regression, standard errors, and Bayesian lassos
Casella, G., Ghosh, M., Gill, J., & Kyung, M. (2010) · Bayesian Analysis · doi:10.1214/10-ba607 · Cited by 567
Metadata
- Authors
- LIU, J. S., WONG, W. H., & KONG, A.
- Venue
- Biometrika
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-03-01
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-40
- ISSN
- 0006-3444 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3510
- OpenAlex
- W2162898443
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Covariance structure of the Gibbs sampler with applications to the comparisons of estimators and augmentation schemes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/biomet/81.1.27
- The paper
- LIU, J. S., WONG, W. H., & KONG, A. (1994). Covariance structure of the Gibbs sampler with applications to the comparisons of estimators and augmentation schemes. Biometrika. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/81.1.27
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.