The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extended Bayesian information criteria for model selection with large model spaces
Abstract
The ordinary Bayesian information criterion is too liberal for model selection when the model space is large. In this paper, we re-examine the Bayesian paradigm for model selection and propose an extended family of Bayesian information criteria, which take into account both the number of unknown parameters and the complexity of the model space. Their consistency is established, in particular allowing the number of covariates to increase to infinity with the sample size. Their performance in various situations is evaluated by simulation studies. It is demonstrated that the extended Bayesian information criteria incur a small loss in the positive selection rate but tightly control the false discovery rate, a desirable property in many applications. The extended Bayesian information criteria are extremely useful for variable selection in problems with a moderate sample size but with a huge number of covariates, especially in genome-wide association studies, which are now an active area in genetics research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Craven, P., & Wahba, G. (1978) · Numerische Mathematik · doi:10.1007/bf01404567 · Cited by 3,388
Cited by
A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks
Epskamp, S., & Fried, E. I. (2018) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000167 · Cited by 2,918
Huang, M., Liu, X., Zhou, Y., Summers, R. M., & Zhang, Z. (2019) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giy154 · Cited by 855
Sensitivity and specificity of information criteria
(2019) · doi:10.1093/bib/bbz016 · Cited by 718
Multiple predicting K -fold cross-validation for model selection
Jung, Y. (2018) · Journal of Nonparametric Statistics · doi:10.1080/10485252.2017.1404598 · Cited by 499
Alterations in Enteric Virome Are Associated With Colorectal Cancer and Survival Outcomes
Nakatsu, G., Zhou, H., Wu, W. K. K., Wong, S. H., Coker, O. O., Dai, Z., Li, X., Szeto, C.-H., Sugimura, N., Lam, T. Y.-T., et al. (2018) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.04.018 · Cited by 386
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, J., & Chen, Z.
- Venue
- Biometrika
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-09-01
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 759-771
- ISSN
- 0006-3444 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3510
- OpenAlex
- W2053061982
- Cited by
- 2,011
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extended Bayesian information criteria for model selection with large model spaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/biomet/asn034
- The paper
- Chen, J., & Chen, Z. (2008). Extended Bayesian information criteria for model selection with large model spaces. Biometrika. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asn034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.