Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 0

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Bayesian semiparametric modeling of biomarker variability in joint models

Chen, Sida, Barrett, Jessica K, Palma, Marco, Pan, Jianxin, Tom, Brian D M·2026·Biometrics

Abstract

There is growing interest in the role of within-individual variability (WIV) in biomarker trajectories for assessing disease risk and progression. A trajectory-based definition that has attracted recent attention characterizes WIV as the curvature-based roughness of the latent biomarker trajectory, and we refer to the resulting measure as trajectory-based biomarker WIV (TB-WIV). To evaluate TB-WIV associations with clinical outcomes and perform dynamic risk prediction, joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data (JM) are necessary. However, specifying the longitudinal trajectory is critical and poses methodological challenges. In this work, we investigate three Bayesian semiparametric approaches for longitudinal modeling and TB-WIV estimation. We propose two new approaches based on Bayesian penalized splines (P-splines) and functional principal component analysis, and adapt an existing semiparametric approach to the Bayesian JM setting. Through simulation studies, we evaluate parameter estimation, detection of TB-WIV associations, estimation of their raw and standardized magnitudes, and survival prediction, providing insights for method choice and highlighting the need for caution when interpreting raw TB-WIV association magnitudes. We apply the approaches to UK Cystic Fibrosis Registry data, where we identify significant positive associations between lung function TB-WIV and mortality risk in patients with cystic fibrosis, after adjustment for the underlying lung function level, and provide evidence that TB-WIV adds information for survival prediction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/biomtc/ujag146

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Barrett, 2019, Estimating the association between blood pressure variability and cardiovascular disease: An application using the ARIC Study, Statistics in Medicine, 38, 1855, 10.1002/sim.8074 · DOI
  2. Bell, 2018, Prognostic impact of systolic blood pressure variability in people with diabetes, PLoS One, 13, e0194084, 10.1371/journal.pone.0194084 · DOI
  3. Courcoul, 2025, A location-scale joint model for studying the link between the time-dependent subject-specific variability of blood pressure and competing events, Statistics in Medicine, 44, e70244, 10.1002/sim.70244 · doi:10.1002/sim.70244
  4. Gao, 2011, A joint-modeling approach to assess the impact of biomarker variability on the risk of developing clinical outcome, Statistical Methods and Applications, 20, 83, 10.1007/s10260-010-0150-z · DOI
  5. Lang, 2004, Bayesian P-splines, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 13, 183, 10.1198/1061860043010 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Luo, 2025, Semiparametric modeling of biomarker trajectory and variability with correlated measurement errors, Statistics in Medicine, 44, e70028, 10.1002/sim.70028 · doi:10.1002/sim.70028
  7. Morgan, 2016, Forced expiratory volume in 1 second variability helps identify patients with cystic fibrosis at risk of greater loss of lung function, The Journal of Pediatrics, 169, 116, 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.08.042 · DOI
  8. Nagai, 2015, Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability and dementia, Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 15, 26, 10.1111/ggi.12660 · DOI
  9. Palma, 2026, A Bayesian location-scale joint model for time-to-event and multivariate longitudinal data with association based on within-individual variability, Statistics in Medicine, 45, e70596, 10.1002/sim.70596 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Palma, 2024, Demographic factors associated with within-individual variability of lung function for adults with cystic fibrosis: A UK registry study, Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 23, 936, 10.1016/j.jcf.2024.05.013 · DOI
  11. Papageorgiou, 2019, An overview of joint modeling of time-to-event and longitudinal outcomes, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 6, 223, 10.1146/annurev-statistics-030718-105048 · DOI
  12. Ramsay, 2005, Functional Data Analysis, 10.1007/b98888 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Rothwell, 2010, Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension, The Lancet, 375, 895, 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60308-X · DOI · Paper page
  14. Scheipl, 2012, Spike-and-slab priors for function selection in structured additive regression models, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 107, 1518, 10.1080/01621459.2012.737742 · DOI
  15. Simpkin, 2018, Derivative estimation for longitudinal data analysis: Examining features of blood pressure measured repeatedly during pregnancy, Statistics in Medicine, 37, 2836, 10.1002/sim.7694 · DOI
  16. Vehtari, 2017, Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC, Statistics and Computing, 27, 1413, 10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4 · DOI
  17. Wang, 2024, Modeling biomarker variability in joint analysis of longitudinal and time-to-event data, Biostatistics, 25, 577, 10.1093/biostatistics/kxad009 · DOI
  18. Wang, 2024, Weighted biomarker variability in joint analysis of longitudinal and time-to-event data, The Annals of Applied Statistics, 18, 2576, 10.1214/24-AOAS1896 · doi:10.1214/24-aoas1896
  19. Wang, 2025, Joint modeling of longitudinal and survival data, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 12, 449, 10.1146/annurev-statistics-112723-034334 · DOI
  20. Xiao, 2018, Fast covariance estimation for sparse functional data, Statistics and Computing, 28, 511, 10.1007/s11222-017-9744-8 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Chen, S., Barrett, J. K., Palma, M., Pan, J., & Tom, B. D. M.
Venue
Biometrics
Published
2026-07-01
Volume
82
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0006-341X
  • 1541-0420
Cited by
0
Language
en
Funders
  • UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00040/02, MR/V020595/1)
  • MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies
  • Ulverscroft Vision Research Group at University College London
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (12271047)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian semiparametric modeling of biomarker variability in joint models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/biomtc/ujag146
The paper
Chen, S., Barrett, J. K., Palma, M., Pan, J., & Tom, B. D. M. (2026). Bayesian semiparametric modeling of biomarker variability in joint models. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomtc/ujag146

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.