The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Bayesian semiparametric modeling of biomarker variability in joint models
Abstract
There is growing interest in the role of within-individual variability (WIV) in biomarker trajectories for assessing disease risk and progression. A trajectory-based definition that has attracted recent attention characterizes WIV as the curvature-based roughness of the latent biomarker trajectory, and we refer to the resulting measure as trajectory-based biomarker WIV (TB-WIV). To evaluate TB-WIV associations with clinical outcomes and perform dynamic risk prediction, joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data (JM) are necessary. However, specifying the longitudinal trajectory is critical and poses methodological challenges. In this work, we investigate three Bayesian semiparametric approaches for longitudinal modeling and TB-WIV estimation. We propose two new approaches based on Bayesian penalized splines (P-splines) and functional principal component analysis, and adapt an existing semiparametric approach to the Bayesian JM setting. Through simulation studies, we evaluate parameter estimation, detection of TB-WIV associations, estimation of their raw and standardized magnitudes, and survival prediction, providing insights for method choice and highlighting the need for caution when interpreting raw TB-WIV association magnitudes. We apply the approaches to UK Cystic Fibrosis Registry data, where we identify significant positive associations between lung function TB-WIV and mortality risk in patients with cystic fibrosis, after adjustment for the underlying lung function level, and provide evidence that TB-WIV adds information for survival prediction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Barrett, 2019, Estimating the association between blood pressure variability and cardiovascular disease: An application using the ARIC Study, Statistics in Medicine, 38, 1855, 10.1002/sim.8074 · DOI
- Bell, 2018, Prognostic impact of systolic blood pressure variability in people with diabetes, PLoS One, 13, e0194084, 10.1371/journal.pone.0194084 · DOI
- Courcoul, 2025, A location-scale joint model for studying the link between the time-dependent subject-specific variability of blood pressure and competing events, Statistics in Medicine, 44, e70244, 10.1002/sim.70244 · doi:10.1002/sim.70244
- Gao, 2011, A joint-modeling approach to assess the impact of biomarker variability on the risk of developing clinical outcome, Statistical Methods and Applications, 20, 83, 10.1007/s10260-010-0150-z · DOI
- Lang, 2004, Bayesian P-splines, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 13, 183, 10.1198/1061860043010 · DOI · Paper page
- Luo, 2025, Semiparametric modeling of biomarker trajectory and variability with correlated measurement errors, Statistics in Medicine, 44, e70028, 10.1002/sim.70028 · doi:10.1002/sim.70028
- Morgan, 2016, Forced expiratory volume in 1 second variability helps identify patients with cystic fibrosis at risk of greater loss of lung function, The Journal of Pediatrics, 169, 116, 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.08.042 · DOI
- Nagai, 2015, Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability and dementia, Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 15, 26, 10.1111/ggi.12660 · DOI
- Palma, 2026, A Bayesian location-scale joint model for time-to-event and multivariate longitudinal data with association based on within-individual variability, Statistics in Medicine, 45, e70596, 10.1002/sim.70596 · DOI · Paper page
- Palma, 2024, Demographic factors associated with within-individual variability of lung function for adults with cystic fibrosis: A UK registry study, Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 23, 936, 10.1016/j.jcf.2024.05.013 · DOI
- Papageorgiou, 2019, An overview of joint modeling of time-to-event and longitudinal outcomes, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 6, 223, 10.1146/annurev-statistics-030718-105048 · DOI
- Ramsay, 2005, Functional Data Analysis, 10.1007/b98888 · DOI · Paper page
- Rothwell, 2010, Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension, The Lancet, 375, 895, 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60308-X · DOI · Paper page
- Scheipl, 2012, Spike-and-slab priors for function selection in structured additive regression models, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 107, 1518, 10.1080/01621459.2012.737742 · DOI
- Simpkin, 2018, Derivative estimation for longitudinal data analysis: Examining features of blood pressure measured repeatedly during pregnancy, Statistics in Medicine, 37, 2836, 10.1002/sim.7694 · DOI
- Vehtari, 2017, Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC, Statistics and Computing, 27, 1413, 10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4 · DOI
- Wang, 2024, Modeling biomarker variability in joint analysis of longitudinal and time-to-event data, Biostatistics, 25, 577, 10.1093/biostatistics/kxad009 · DOI
- Wang, 2024, Weighted biomarker variability in joint analysis of longitudinal and time-to-event data, The Annals of Applied Statistics, 18, 2576, 10.1214/24-AOAS1896 · doi:10.1214/24-aoas1896
- Wang, 2025, Joint modeling of longitudinal and survival data, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 12, 449, 10.1146/annurev-statistics-112723-034334 · DOI
- Xiao, 2018, Fast covariance estimation for sparse functional data, Statistics and Computing, 28, 511, 10.1007/s11222-017-9744-8 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, S., Barrett, J. K., Palma, M., Pan, J., & Tom, B. D. M.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2026-07-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0006-341X
- 1541-0420
- Cited by
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00040/02, MR/V020595/1)
- MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies
- Ulverscroft Vision Research Group at University College London
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (12271047)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian semiparametric modeling of biomarker variability in joint models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/biomtc/ujag146
- The paper
- Chen, S., Barrett, J. K., Palma, M., Pan, J., & Tom, B. D. M. (2026). Bayesian semiparametric modeling of biomarker variability in joint models. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomtc/ujag146
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.