The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Importance of Data Citation
Open accessAbstract
Over the past decade, a growing movement toward greater accessibility, transparency, and reproducibility has taken hold in the scientific community. One area of open science that has gained significant traction is the concept of FAIR data principles—that is, guidelines ensuring data are findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable. Indeed, many scientific journals now require data be made available in FAIR-aligned repositories prior to publication—and, in some cases, even prior to acceptance. These issues are important to me as an information manager in the US Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network, which has long been a pioneer in scientific data management. FAIR data are accompanied by high-quality metadata, and when archived in FAIR-aligned repositories, they receive persistent, unique identifiers (e.g., a digital object identifier, or DOI) to track provenance and enable data citation. While great strides have been made to establish data management best practices, scientists are lagging behind with respect to proper data citation. Data are a valuable research output, and providers should be credited accordingly. Moreover, scientists have a professional responsibility to ensure that data are properly cited. Citing data is as easy as citing a publication; thus, the format and placement of data citations should be quite familiar. Data citations should include, at minimum, the author, year of publication, title, publisher (the data repository), DOI, and, where appro…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“RHS is based on 6 important reference items that make each reference unique and easily trackable for citation, in addition to a seventh item related to the relevance of the reference to the topic prompt [26].”
From Reference Hallucination Score for Medical Artificial Intelligence Chatbots: Development and Usability Study (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Aljamaan, F., Temsah, M.-H., Altamimi, I., Al-Eyadhy, A., Jamal, A., Alhasan, K., Mesallam, T. A., Farahat, M., & Malki, K. H. (2024) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/54345 · Cited by 211
“RHS is based on 6 important reference items that make each reference unique and easily trackable for citation, in addition to a seventh item related to the relevance of the reference to the topic prompt [26].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, R. F.
- Affiliations
- University of New Mexico (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brown, Renée F
- ORCID
- Brown, Renée F
- Venue
- BioScience
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2021-03-01
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 211-211
- ISSN
- 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3244
- OpenAlex
- W3134855184
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BioScience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Keywords
- data citation, FAIR principles, open science, data repositories, digital object identifiers, data reuse, data licensing, research transparency, reproducibility, Long Term Ecological Research Network, research data management, metadata, data provenance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review