The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Natural Sediment Regime in Rivers: Broadening the Foundation for Ecosystem Management
Abstract
Water and sediment inputs are fundamental drivers of river ecosystems, but river management tends to emphasize flow regime at the expense of sediment regime. In an effort to frame a more inclusive paradigm for river management, we discuss sediment inputs, transport, and storage within river systems; interactions among water, sediment, and valley context; and the need to broaden the natural flow regime concept. Explicitly incorporating sediment is challenging, because sediment is supplied, transported, and stored by nonlinear and episodic processes operating at different temporal and spatial scales than water and because sediment regimes have been highly altered by humans. Nevertheless, managing for a desired balance between sediment supply and transport capacity is not only tractable, given current geomorphic process knowledge, but also essential because of the importance of sediment regimes to aquatic and riparian ecosystems, the physical template of which depends on sediment-driven river structure and function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Are large‐scale flow experiments informing the science and management of freshwater ecosystems?
Olden, J. D., Konrad, C. P., Melis, T. S., Kennard, M. J., Freeman, M. C., Mims, M. C., Bray, E. N., Gido, K. B., Hemphill, N. P., Lytle, D. A., et al. (2014) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/130076 · Cited by 223
Cited by
Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity
Reid, A. J., Carlson, A. K., Creed, I. F., Eliason, E. J., Gell, P. A., Johnson, P. T. J., Kidd, K. A., MacCormack, T. J., Olden, J. D., Ormerod, S. J., et al. (2019) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12480 · Cited by 3,645
The science and practice of river restoration
Wohl, E., Lane, S. N., & Wilcox, A. C. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2014wr016874 · Cited by 710
Self-citationPoff, N. L. (2018) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/fwb.13038 · Cited by 389
Self-citationStatus and trends of dam removal research in the United States
Ryan Bellmore, J., Duda, J. J., Craig, L. S., Greene, S. L., Torgersen, C. E., Collins, M. J., & Vittum, K. (2017) · WIREs Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.1164 · Cited by 272
The intervention continuum in restoration ecology: rethinking the active–passive dichotomy
Chazdon, R. L., Falk, D. A., Banin, L. F., Wagner, M., J. Wilson, S., Grabowski, R. C., & Suding, K. N. (2024) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/rec.13535 · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- Wohl, E., Bledsoe, B. P., Jacobson, R. B., Poff, N. L., Rathburn, S. L., Walters, D. M., & Wilcox, A. C.
- Venue
- BioScience
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-02-19
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 358-371
- ISSN
- 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3244
- OpenAlex
- W2113580194
- Cited by
- 533
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Natural Sediment Regime in Rivers: Broadening the Foundation for Ecosystem Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/biosci/biv002
- The paper
- Wohl, E., Bledsoe, B. P., Jacobson, R. B., Poff, N. L., Rathburn, S. L., Walters, D. M., & Wilcox, A. C. (2015). The Natural Sediment Regime in Rivers: Broadening the Foundation for Ecosystem Management. BioScience. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.