Cited by 249Blood transfusion and managementTrauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, ResuscitationHemostasis and retained surgical items

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Usefulness of standard plasma coagulation tests in the management of perioperative coagulopathic bleeding: is there any evidence?

Open access
Haas, T., Fries, D., Tanaka, K.A., Asmis, L., Curry, N.S., Schöchl, H.·2015·British Journal of Anaesthesia

Abstract

Standard laboratory coagulation tests (SLTs) such as prothrombin time/international normalized ratio or partial thromboplastin time are frequently used to assess coagulopathy and to guide haemostatic interventions. However, this has been challenged by numerous reports, including the current European guidelines for perioperative bleeding management, which question the utility and reliability of SLTs in this setting. Furthermore, the arbitrary definition of coagulopathy (i.e. SLTs are prolonged by more than 1.5-fold) has been questioned. The present study aims to review the evidence for the usefulness of SLTs to assess coagulopathy and to guide bleeding management in the perioperative and massive bleeding setting. Medline was searched for investigations using results of SLTs as a means to determine coagulopathy or to guide bleeding management, and the outcomes (i.e. blood loss, transfusion requirements, mortality) were reported. A total of 11 guidelines for management of massive bleeding or perioperative bleeding and 64 studies investigating the usefulness of SLTs in this setting were identified and were included for final data synthesis. Referenced evidence for the usefulness of SLTs was found in only three prospective trials, investigating a total of 108 patients (whereby microvascular bleeding was a rare finding). Furthermore, no data from randomized controlled trials support the use of SLTs. In contrast, numerous investigations have challenged the reliability of SLTs to assess coagulopathy or guide bleeding management. There is actually no sound evidence from well-designed studies that confirm the usefulness of SLTs for diagnosis of coagulopathy or to guide haemostatic therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bja/aeu303

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 74 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Executive Committee of the German Medical Association on the Recommendation of the Scientific Advisory Board, 2009, Cross-sectional guidelines for therapy with blood components and plasma derivatives: Chapter 7 Procoagulators, Transfus Med Hemother, 36, 419

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–249 of 249

Metadata

Authors
Haas, T., Fries, D., Tanaka, K. A., Asmis, L., Curry, N. S., & Schöchl, H.
Affiliations
  • University Children's Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • Innsbruck Medical University (AT)
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
  • Unilabs (Switzerland) (CH)
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • Paracelsus Medical University (AT)
Venue
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
114
Issue
2
Pages
217-224
ISSN
0007-0912 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109382862
Cited by
249
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 19
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Anaesthesia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood transfusion and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hemostasis and retained surgical items
Keywords
coagulopathy, perioperative bleeding, massive hemorrhage, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time, hemostatic therapy, blood transfusion, microvascular bleeding, diagnostic reliability
MeSH terms
Blood Coagulation Disorders, Blood Coagulation Tests, Hemorrhage, Humans, Intraoperative Complications, Postoperative Complications, Evidence-Based Medicine, Perioperative Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review